Supreme Court Declines “Statistically Significant Risk” Standard for Determining Materiality in Securities Fraud

more+
less-

On March 22, 2011, the Supreme Court issued a unanimous opinion in Matrixx Initiatives v. Siracusano, that reaffirmed its long-standing test for determining materiality with respect to securities fraud claims under Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5, and rejected a "bright-line" materiality rule based on whether or not there was a "statistically significant number" of adverse events.

The case arose out of Matrixx's failure to disclose that its leading product – Zicam Cold Remedy – had caused a loss of the sense of smell (known as anosmia) in less than two dozen users, a statistically insignificant number of adverse events. Investors brought suit after Matrixx's stock price dropped once the adverse events and suspected link between Zicam and anosmia were reported on television, and alleged that Matrixx and some of its executives had fraudulently failed to disclose the adverse event reports linking Zicam and anosmia in violation of Section 10(b) and Rule 10b-5.

Please see full article below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Published In: Business Organization Updates, Business Torts Updates, Civil Procedure Updates, Securities Updates

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Lane Powell PC | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »