Supreme Court defended secured creditor stating that premises in insolvency management shall be treated as being part of the pledged building

by White & Case LLP
Contact

White & Case LLP

In Russian insolvency procedures, it is quite common for third parties to try to exclude property from a debtor’s insolvent estate (konkursnaya massa) by claiming title to its real property in the absence of the registered title. These third parties may refer to the agreements that had been made prior to the commencement of the insolvency procedure as well as to the actual transfer of property to them. In considering a claim, a conflict arises between the registration of title to real property in the Russian Unified State Register of Rights to Real Estate and Transactions (EGRP) and possession of property by third parties.

In similar circumstances, White & Case has successfully defended the rights of a secured creditor in insolvency proceedings before the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation (the "Supreme Court") and proved its case concerning priority of registration of title to real property over actual possession of property. This case before the Supreme Court yields precedential value in clarifying this important legal issue and in providing protection for the debtors' insolvent estates against third-party claims.

Background

KB "Uniastrum Bank" (LLC) (the "Bank") was an insolvency creditor (konkursniy creditor) of "Ozdorovitelniy kompleks "Gamma" LLC (the "Debtor"). The Bank’s claims against the Debtor were secured by a pledge over several hotel buildings.

Prior to the commencement of the insolvency procedure, the Debtor as a seller and a third party as a buyer (the "Buyer") had entered into a sale purchase agreement in respect of the disputed premises located in one of the pledged buildings. The Buyer paid for the disputed premises; however, the Debtor failed to register the disputed premises as separate objects and to transfer proprietary interests in them to the Buyer. First, the Buyer filed a claim against the Debtor for the transfer of title to the disputed premises, which was later withdrawn. The Buyer then filed a claim against the Debtor for termination of the agreement, which was dismissed by the court.

In the course of insolvency proceedings, an insolvency manager (konkursniy upravlyaushiy) of the Debtor filed a claim with the court for the approval of the terms and conditions applicable to the sale of property pledged to the Bank. These terms, among other things, define the pledged property and set its starting selling price at auction for the purpose of its sale in the course of insolvency management (konkursnoe proizvodstvo). The court of first instance affirmed the validity of the terms and the starting selling price of the pledged property. It is worth mentioning that the Buyer has neither participated in the Debtor’s insolvency proceedings, nor brought any claims against the Debtor.

The court of appeal appointed an expert in order to determine the market price of the pledged property. According to expert evidence, there were two ways to determine the market price of one of the buildings: the price of the building as a whole; or, the price of the building less the price of the disputed premises. In order to determine the starting selling price of the building, the court of appeal used the market price of the building less the price of the disputed premises. The court of appeal explained in its decision that the price of the disputed premises was excluded from the price of the pledged building because the Buyer had claims for the disputed premises arising under the sale purchase agreement. The cassation court upheld the decision of the court of appeal.

The Supreme Court allowed a cassation appeal of the Bank and set aside the resolutions of the cassation court and the court of appeal. In its ruling No. 308-ЭС15-12123 of 26 December 2016 (the "Ruling"), the Supreme Court held that, as a result of the lower courts resolutions, the disputed premises owned by the Debtor were effectively excluded from its insolvent estate. Further, the lower courts did not consider whether the Buyer could even acquire the ownership rights over the disputed premises after the commencement of the insolvency management stage in respect of the Debtor.

Prior to the Ruling and the Supreme Court ruling No. 308-ЭС16-12236 of 28 December 2016 in a case concerning similar questions of law, there had been uncertainty in the court practice of the commercial courts as to whether a claim for registration of the title transfer could be made against an insolvent outside insolvency proceedings.

Some courts were of the view that a claim for registration of title is not a proprietary claim and, thus, it can be made against a debtor outside insolvency proceedings.1 As a result, third parties could demand and obtain property from the debtors' insolvent estates, thus impairing the rights of insolvency creditors.

On the other hand, there was also a position that a claim for registration of title constitutes a proprietary claim and can be made against a debtor only in accordance with a special procedure in the course of insolvency proceedings.2 Under this approach, it is necessary to determine the value of the claim for registration of title to property of a debtor and to record such claim with a claims register in accordance with insolvency rules. A party that makes such claim against a debtor does not have an advantage over insolvency creditors.

As a result of this uncertainty, there were cases when the debtor’s property was excluded from its insolvent estate because the court upheld a claim for registration of title and this resulted in the diminution of value of the insolvent estate.

Conclusion

The reasoning adopted by the Supreme Court in its Ruling is of vital importance to the effective protection of the insolvency creditors' rights at the time of the sale of the pledged property in insolvency proceedings. Additionally, it develops a consistent pro-creditor approach adopted by the Supreme Court in insolvency proceedings.

Creditors can use this reasoning of the Supreme Court to effectively defend themselves from actions being brought in order to exclude the valuable assets of a debtor from the insolvent estate.

Click here to download PDF (English and Russian).

1 See Resolution of the Federal Commercial Court for the Central Circuit dated 28 February 2014 in Case No. А68-2837/2013 (according to the Supreme Court Ruling No. ВАС-6194/14 dated 29 May 2014, the Supreme Court refused to transfer a case for a supervisory review to the Presidium of the Supreme Court); Ruling of the Supreme Court No. 309-ЭС14-6932 dated 26 December 2014 in Case No. А50-17142/2013; Resolution of the Commercial Court for the Ural Circuit No. Ф09-8048/14 dated 26 November 2014 in Case No. А60-36891/2013
2 See Resolution of the Federal Commercial Court for the Moscow Circuit No. Ф05-590/2014 dated 28 February 2014 in Case No. А41-24324/13; Resolution of the Commercial Court for the Moscow Circuit No. Ф05-13988/2011 dated 14 September 2016 in Case No. А41-5150/11.

Anna Boer, an associate at White & Case, assisted in the development of this publication.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© White & Case LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

White & Case LLP
Contact
more
less

White & Case LLP on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):
hide

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.

Security

JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at info@jdsupra.com. In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at: info@jdsupra.com.

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.
Feedback? Tell us what you think of the new jdsupra.com!