Supreme Court Endorses “Holistic” Approach to Evaluating Securities Fraud in Tellabs

more+
less-

Supreme Court Endorses “Holistic” Approach to Evaluating Securities Fraud in Tellabs

The Supreme Court has issued its much-anticipated decision in Tellabs v. Makor Issues & Rights, No. 06-484,

551 U.S. ___ (June 21, 2007). Tellabs holds that a court must consider competing inferences in determining

whether the allegations in a securities fraud complaint give rise to a “strong inference” of scienter, as required

by the heightened pleading standard set forth in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (the

“Reform Act”). Congress imposed the heightened pleading requirement as a check against abusive litigation in

private securities fraud actions. While Tellabs provides guidance about what constitutes a “strong inference” of scienter, it rejects any brightline rules.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Written by:

more+
less-

Morrison & Foerster LLP on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:

Sign up to create your digest using LinkedIn*

*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.
×
Loading...
×
×