In a recent copyright case revolving around the film Raging Bull, the Supreme Court held that the equitable doctrine of laches, which generally prevents claims where there was an unreasonable delay, does not bar a claim brought within the three-year statute of limitations articulated in the Copyright Act. Petrella v. Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, Inc., 572 U.S. ___ (2014). The opinion went on to give a primer on the effects of delays in bringing intellectual property claims, particularly how the doctrines of laches and estoppel play out in copyright, trademark, and patent cases.
The Backstory -
Boxing champion Jake LaMotta and his friend Frank Petrella told the story of LaMotta’s boxing career in two screenplays and a book, registered in 1963, 1970, and 1973. Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer (MGM) acquired the motion picture rights, and in 1980, released the film Raging Bull. A year later, in 1981, Petrella died. Upon his death, his renewal rights in his copyright reverted to his heirs (these works were registered before the current Copyright Act and required renewals). His heirs then had the right to renew the copyrights unburdened by any prior assignment, which his daughter did in 1991.
Please see full article below for more information.
Firefox recommends the PDF Plugin for Mac OS X for viewing PDF documents in your browser.
We can also show you Legal Updates using the Google Viewer; however, you will need to be logged into Google Docs to view them.
Please choose one of the above to proceed!
LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.
Topics: Copyright, Copyright Infringement, Estoppel, Laches, MGM, Petrella v. MGM, SCOTUS, Statute of Limitations
Published In: Art, Entertainment & Sports Updates, Civil Procedure Updates, Intellectual Property Updates
DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.
© Venable LLP | Attorney Advertising