Last week’s decision by the U.S. Supreme Court in Daimler AG v. Bauman clarified the law on general jurisdiction and should bring some comfort to foreign parent companies whose ownership of a subsidiary in the United States is their primary contact with the country.
In May 2011, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals expanded the reach of general jurisdiction over a foreign corporation by imputing the contacts of its U.S. subsidiary to justify the exercise of personal jurisdiction over the corporation in a California court. In Bauman, the Supreme Court rejected this expansion of general jurisdiction and provided much-needed certainty on the limits of the potential forums a corporation could be brought before under the principle of general jurisdiction.
Originally published in Law 360 on January 21, 2014.
Please see full article below for more information.
Firefox recommends the PDF Plugin for Mac OS X for viewing PDF documents in your browser.
We can also show you Legal Updates using the Google Viewer; however, you will need to be logged into Google Docs to view them.
Please choose one of the above to proceed!
LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.
Topics: DaimlerChrysler, DaimlerChrysler v Bauman, Foreign Corporations, Foreign Jurisdictions, Foreign Subsidiaries, Jurisdiction, Personal Jurisdiction, SCOTUS
Published In: Civil Procedure Updates, General Business Updates, International Trade Updates, Personal Injury Updates
DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.
© Baker Botts | Attorney Advertising