Supreme Court of Georgia Addresses the Constitutionality of Key Provisions of the Georgia Tort Reform Act of 2005

more+
less-

Recently, the Supreme Court of Georgia issued three opinions on the constitutionality of key provisions of the Georgia Tort Reform Act of 2005. In separate cases, the Court upheld the constitutionality of a “gross negligence” standard of care for malpractice claims against emergency health care providers, upheld the offer of judgment and offer of settlement statute, but declared unconstitutional the $350,000 cap on noneconomic damages in medical malpractice cases. These decisions will have a significant impact on medical malpractice cases, although the offer of settlement statute applies to tort claims generally, not just medical malpractice cases. The Court’s decisions are described in further detail below.

Please see full alert below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Published In: Constitutional Law Updates, Health Updates, Insurance Updates, Professional Malpractice Updates

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Sutherland Asbill & Brennan LLP | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »