Supreme Court rejects premise for GHG Tailoring Rule, but largely maintains EPA’s authority to set GHG emission limits

by DLA Piper
Contact

In a split decision, the United States Supreme Court confirmed the Environmental Protection Agency’s authority to regulate greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from new and modified stationary sources that are required to obtain pre-construction and operating permits for non-GHG air pollutants.  EPA may thus require these sources to meet GHG emissions limitations. 

The Court also held in its June 23 decision that the EPA may not require a source to obtain a pre-construction or operating permit solely on the basis of its potential GHG emissions.  See U.A.R.G. v. EPA, 573 U.S. ____ (2014).

The Court’s decision upholds EPA’s regulation of roughly 83 percent of stationary source GHG emissions under its permitting program.

Background: The Clean Air Act

Under the Clean Air Act, major criteria pollutant-emitting facilities are required to obtain a pre-construction permit (e.g., a Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) permit)  before constructing or undertaking a major modification of a source in certain areas.  The PSD permit imposes emission limitations on the source that reflect the best available control technology (BACT). 

The Act defines “major emitting facilities as any stationary source with the potential to emit 250 tons per year of “any air pollutant” (or 100 tons per year for certain types of sources).  The Act also requires a major stationary source to obtain a Title V operating permit that includes all emissions limitations and standards that apply to the source, among other requirements.

EPA’s GHG regulations

After the Supreme Court held in Massachusetts v. EPA (2007) that GHGs may constitute an “air pollutant” under the Act, EPA initiated its  regulation of GHG emissions. 

First, EPA determined that GHG emissions endanger public health and welfare by contributing to global climate change. 

Second, EPA determined that once it promulgated GHG standards for mobile sources, GHG emissions would become an “air pollutant” and trigger the applicability of major stationary source permitting requirements (i.e., PSD and Title V permits).

Next, in 2010, EPA finalized its so-called Tailoring Rule that increased the permitting thresholds from 100 or 250 tons per year for GHGs to 75,000 tons per year for modified sources and 100,000 tons per year for new sources. In the rulemaking, EPA explained that these higher thresholds were necessary because the permitting programs were designed to regulate “a relatively small number of large industrial sources” and the lower statutory thresholds would require millions of previously unregulated sources to incur significant costs and would overwhelm the administrative resources at the federal and state levels.

What the Court said

Writing for a divided Court[1], Justice Antonin Scalia held that the decision in Massachusetts did not compel EPA, nor does the Act allow EPA, to determine that promulgating GHG emissions standards for mobile sources requires the application of stationary-source permitting requirements to GHG sources. 

Justice Scalia reasoned that the term “air pollutant” is used differently, depending on its context in the Act.  EPA has often given the term “air pollutant” a narrower, context-appropriate meaning.  He stated that applying the PSD and Title V permitting requirements to GHGs would “bring about an enormous and transformative expansion in EPA’s regulatory authority without clear congressional authorization” and is therefore an unreasonable interpretation of the Act. The Court also held that EPA lacked the authority to tailor the Act’s unambiguous numerical thresholds in its Tailoring Rule.  The effect of these holdings is that EPA may not require PSD or Title V permits for a source solely based on its GHG emissions.

In contrast, the Court held that EPA may require BACT emission limits for GHGs emitted by sources that are otherwise subject to PSD review for non-GHG criteria pollutants (often called an “anyway” source).[2]  Justice Scalia reasoned that the Act prescribes a more precise applicability test for BACT emission standards, namely “for each pollutant subject to regulation under this chapter (i.e., the entire Act).”

Because BACT limits apply to a regulated pollutant (as opposed to the more generic “any pollutant” discussed in Massachusetts), EPA acted within its authority when it applied BACT requirements to  GHG emissions from “anyway” sources.  The Court held that EPA may require an “anyway” source to comply with a GHG BACT emission limit if the source will emit more than a de minimis amount of greenhouse gases.  Without opining on whether EPA’s 75,000 ton per year minimum threshold under the Tailoring Rule constituted an appropriate de minimis level, the Court directed EPA to establish a de minimis level on proper grounds.  We expect that EPA will establish a de minimis threshold below which BACT limits will not be required for a source’s GHG emissions.

In practical terms, only a modest change

The Supreme Court’s decision is legally significant in limiting EPA’s broad, asserted authority to regulate GHGs from stationary sources under the PSD and Title V permitting programs (and potentially other sections of the Act).  Practically speaking, however, EPA will still be able to regulate 83 percent of stationary source GHG emissions under the PSD/Title V permitting process, because almost all these sources also emit significant quantities of criteria air pollutants.  In fact, only 3 percent of new or modified GHG-only stationary sources previously subject to the Tailoring Rule will now no longer be subject to regulation.

[1] Justice Stephen Breyer (joined by Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan) dissented in part on the grounds that EPA had the authority to regulate GHGs under the Title V and PSD permitting process regardless of whether a source emitting non-GHGs.

[2] This holding was supported by seven justices; the exceptions were Justices Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas.

 

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© DLA Piper | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

DLA Piper
Contact
more
less

DLA Piper on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):
hide

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.

Security

JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at info@jdsupra.com. In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at: info@jdsupra.com.

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.
Feedback? Tell us what you think of the new jdsupra.com!