Supreme Court Relaxes Standard For Determining Whether A Case Is Exceptional In Patent Litigation While Raising The Standard Of Review

by Ropes & Gray LLP
Contact

On April 29, 2014, the Supreme Court issued two decisions relating to the determination of whether a case is exceptional and award of attorneys’ fees in patent litigation. The cases are Octane Fitness, LLC v. Icon Health & Fitness, Inc., No. 12-1184 (April 29, 2014) and Highmark Inc. v. Allcare Health Management System, Inc., No. 12-1163 (April 29, 2014).

Octane Fitness, LLC v. Icon Health & Fitness, Inc.

In the first case, Octane Fitness, LLC v. Icon Health & Fitness, Inc., No. 12-1184 (April 29, 2014), the Court unanimously rejected the rigid standard that previously governed the determination of whether a case is exceptional and an award of attorneys’ fees under 35 U.S.C. § 285 in favor of an approach granting discretion to the district court judge and reducing the associated evidentiary burden.

Both Octane and Icon are manufacturers of exercise equipment. The dispute arose when Icon sued Octane, alleging that several Octane products infringed an Icon patent that Icon had never commercialized. Octane Fitness prevailed on its motion for summary judgment of non-infringement, and then moved for an award of attorneys’ fees, which the district court judge denied.

On appeal, the Federal Circuit affirmed the denial of attorneys’ fees to the prevailing party. Icon Health & Fitness, Inc. v. Octane Fitness, LLC, 496 Fed. Appx. 57, 65 (Fed. Cir. 2012). In so doing, the Federal Circuit declined to reevaluate the test it had established in a previous case, wherein it held that “[a]bsent misconduct in conduct of the litigation or in securing the patents,” a case is “exceptional” under 35 U.S.C. § 285 and allows for an award of attorneys’ fees “only if both (1) the litigation is brought in subjec­tive bad faith, and (2) the litigation is objectively base­less.” Brooks Furniture Mfg., Inc. v. Dutailier Int’l, Inc., 393 F.3d 1378, 1381 (Fed. Cir. 2005). 

On appeal to the Supreme Court, Icon argued for affirmance of the test applied by the Federal Circuit, while Octane argued that the proper standard would be to allow district court judges to determine whether a case is exceptional at their discretion based on the totality of the circumstances.

In its decision, the Court rejected the Federal Circuit’s standard as “overly rigid,” because it “superimposes an inflexible framework onto statutory text that is inherently flexible.” Octane Fitness, No. 12-1184, slip op. at 8. Moreover, the Court found that the standard applied by the Federal Circuit would render 35 U.S.C. § 285 superfluous in light of generally accepted common law rules on fee shifting. 

The Court held that district court judges can find a case exceptional under 35 U.S.C. § 285 when the case “stands out from others with respect to the substantive strength of a party’s litigating position . . . or the unreasonable manner in which the case was litigated.” Id. at 7-8. In so holding, the Court made clear that the decision is to be made in “a case-by-case exercise of [the district court judge’s] discretion, considering the totality of the circumstances.” Id. at 8. The Court also rejected the Federal Circuit’s requirement that entitlement to attorneys’ fees needed to be proven by “clear and convincing evidence,” because the statute itself did not require any deviation from the “preponderance of the evidence” standard generally applied to questions of patent infringement. Id. at 11.

Applying this new standard, the Court reversed and remanded the case for further proceedings consistent with the opinion.

Highmark Inc. v. Allcare Health Management System, Inc.

In the second decision relating to the award of attorneys’ fees in patent litigation, the Supreme Court addressed the related issue of the standard for appellate review with respect to a determination of whether a case is exceptional. In Highmark Inc. v. Allcare Health Management System, Inc., No. 12-1163 (April 29, 2014), the Court held that appellate review of such a ruling should be under the “abuse of discretion” standard—a standard that is highly deferential to the district court judge’s determination.

Highmark runs a Blue Cross Blue Shield entity. Allcare is a non-practicing entity that owns a patent covering a health care management system. Highmark sought declaratory judgment of non-infringement, invalidity, and unenforceability, and Allcare counterclaimed for infringement. After the district court entered a final judgment of non-infringement, Highmark moved for fees under 35 U.S.C. § 285, which the district court granted. 

On appeal, the Federal Circuit affirmed the exceptional case determination as to one claim of the patent-in-suit, but reversed as to another. Highmark Inc. v. Allcare Health Management System, Inc., 687 F.3d 1300, 1311-1315 (Fed. Cir. 2012). In so doing, the Federal Circuit undertook a de novo review of the district court’s decision.

In a unanimous decision, the Supreme Court noted that it had concurrently rejected the Federal Circuit’s test for determining whether a case is exceptional as “unduly rigid and inconsistent with the text of § 285.” Highmark, No. 12-1163, slip op. at 4. Because the Court in Octane committed the determination of whether a case is “exceptional” to the district court’s discretion, the Court in Highmark ruled that such a determination must be reviewed under the “abuse of discretion” standard.

In the Court’s view, the “abuse of discretion” standard is proper because the determination of whether a case is exceptional under 35 U.S.C. § 285 is left to the discretion of the district court judge. According to the Court, the statute therefore implies that deference to the district court should be afforded on appeal.

Applying this appellate standard, the Court remanded the case to the Federal Circuit for further proceedings consistent with the “abuse of discretion” standard of review.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Ropes & Gray LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Ropes & Gray LLP
Contact
more
less

Ropes & Gray LLP on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):
hide

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.

Security

JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at info@jdsupra.com. In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at: info@jdsupra.com.

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.
Feedback? Tell us what you think of the new jdsupra.com!