Supreme Court Reviews Agency Comprised of Dental Professionals in State Action Case: Health Care Antitrust Cases to Watch in 2015

by Nexsen Pruet, PLLC
Contact

Federal and state courts are expected to rule on several nationally watched antitrust health care cases during the first half of 2015. 

As we enter into the first week of the New Year, Nexsen Pruet associate Rachel Anna examines how the cases involve issues such as state action, health care provider mergers and certificate of need regulations.

Supreme Court Reviews Agency Comprised of Dental Professionals in State Action Case

The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari to resolve whether regulatory bodies comprised of market participants are considered private actors, and thus, are subject to antitrust laws unless actively supervised by the state.  On October 14, 2014, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in North Carolina State Board of Dental Examiners v. FTC and a ruling is expected in 2015. 

In 2013, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit held that the North Carolina State Board of Dental Examiners (“Dental Board”) violated federal antitrust laws by precluding non-dentists from offering teeth-whitening services.[1]  The Dental Board argued it was exempt from antitrust laws as a state agency under the state action doctrine.  The Fourth Circuit, however, concluded that the Dental Board must be treated as a private actor and is not actively supervised by the state. 

The Dental Board is an agency created by North Carolina law to protect public health and safety by ensuring that only qualified individuals practice dentistry in North Carolina.  The Dental Board is comprised of six licensed dentists, elected by dentists; one licensed dental hygienist, elected by dental hygienists; and one consumer member, appointed by the Governor.  The Dental Board is funded by fees paid by licensed dentists and dental hygienists.  Under North Carolina law, the Dental Board can issue dental licenses, enact rules and regulations governing dentistry, investigate dental practices, and issue subpoenas. 

This dispute started when non-dentists began offering teeth whitening services at lower prices than dentists.  After receiving complaints from licensed dentists, the Dental Board issued cease-and-desist letters to non-dentist teeth whitening providers demanding that they stop “all activity constituting the practice of dentistry.”  Some letters warned that “[p]racticing dentistry without a license in North Carolina is a crime.”  Recipients of the letters stopped offering teeth-whitening services, forcing consumers to turn to licensed dentists for more expensive procedures.

The Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) investigated and then filed a complaint against the Dental Board, alleging that its conduct unreasonably restrained trade in violation of federal antitrust laws.  In July of 2011, an Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) found that the Dental Board’s actions constituted an unreasonable restraint of trade.  The FTC Commission later upheld the ALJ’s decision. 

The Dental Board appealed the FTC’s decision to the Fourth Circuit on the grounds that its conduct was immune from antitrust liability under the state action doctrine.  The state action doctrine exempts entities when the challenged restraint is (1) pursuant to a clearly articulated and affirmatively expressed state policy to displace competition; and (2) actively supervised by the state itself.  “Municipality acts” pursuant to a clearly articulated state policy are exempt from the active supervision prong. 

The Fourth Circuit held that the Dental Board must be treated as a private actor for state action immunity purposes because the majority of its members were not appointed by the state, but instead, were selected by and accountable to their fellow market participants.  According to the judicial panel, the case was “about a state board run by private actors in the marketplace taking action outside of the procedures mandated by state law to expel a competitor from the market.”  The Fourth Circuit also pointed out that the Dental Board’s “cease-and-desist letters were sent without state oversight and without the required judicial authorization.” 

The Dental Board appealed the Fourth Circuit’s decision to the U.S. Supreme Court earlier this year.  This is the second time the Supreme Court has reviewed the state action doctrine in the last two years.[2] The Supreme Court’s decision could have significant implications for state professional associations and other licensure boards, including their level of regulatory oversight, composition, and appointment.

# # # 

[1] N. Carolina State Bd. of Dental Examiners v. F.T.C., 717 F.3d 359 (4th Cir. 2013), cert. granted sub nom. N. Carolina Bd. of Dental Examiners v. F.T.C., 134 S. Ct. 1491 (2014).

[2] F.T.C. v. Phoebe Putney Health Sys., Inc., 133 S. Ct. 1003 (2013).

 

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Nexsen Pruet, PLLC | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Nexsen Pruet, PLLC
Contact
more
less

Nexsen Pruet, PLLC on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):
hide

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.

Security

JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at info@jdsupra.com. In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at: info@jdsupra.com.

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.