Supreme Court Rules on Wyeth: State Law Claims Not Preempted


On March 4, 2009, the U.S. Supreme Court issued its eagerly awaited decision in Wyeth v. Levine, U.S. Supreme Court No. 06 1249, 555 U.S. ____ (2009). In a 6-3 decision delivered by Justice Stevens, the Court held that federal law does not preempt Levine’s state law failure-to-warn claim concerning the adequacy of a prescription drug label. The Court also stated that a company may unilaterally add a stronger warning to a product label pursuant to the FDA’s “changes being effected” (“CBE”) regulation, and emphasized that a company—and not the FDA bears primary responsibility for drug labeling.

Please see full update for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Written by:

Published In:

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Morrison & Foerster LLP | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »

All the intelligence you need, in one easy email:

Great! Your first step to building an email digest of JD Supra authors and topics. Log in with LinkedIn so we can start sending your digest...

Sign up for your custom alerts now, using LinkedIn ›

* With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name.