Tenth Circuit Holds That Two-And-One-Half Years And Two-And-One-Half Million Dollars Do Not Constitute Prejudice

by Cozen O'Connor
Contact

In BSC Holding, Inc. et al. v. Lexington Ins. Co., — Fed.Appx. –, 2014 WL 929194 (10th Cir., March 11, 2014), the Tenth Circuit recently underscored  how difficult it can be for an insurer to demonstrate prejudice as a result of late notice.  The District of Kansas had granted summary judgment to Lexington, but the Court of Appeals reversed and sent the matter back to the lower court, holding that “substantial prejudice” had not been shown despite the fact that the policyholder had waited two-and-one-half years to notify the carrier and had spent $2.5 million dollars before doing so.

Lyons Salt Company owned a salt mine in Kansas.  In January 2008, mine workers detected an inflow of water into the mine, and the insured set out to determine the cause and to devise a solution.  In April 2010, following an extensive investigation by geotechnical experts and engineers, the inflow was attributed to an improperly sealed oil well that was deforming overlying shale formations.  The experts told Lyons that the situation was “dire”  and that a quick remedy was required, and the insured immediately set about constructing a specially-designed concrete bulkhead to seal off part of the mine.

shutterstock_95321077Lyons notified Lexington of the water inflow in July 2010, after it had already spent $2.5 million on the problem.  The insured sought coverage under six Lexington policies of “all risk” property insurance issued between March 2004 and April 2010.  Suit was filed in the Spring of 2011 after Lexington refused to commit to reimbursement.  The sworn statement in proof of loss that Lyons submitted in December of 2010 sought $7.5 million, and the policyholder was estimating that the total cost of investigating and fixing the intrusion would top $11 million as of last year.

In the trial court, Lexington argued that it had suffered prejudice, and the District of Kansas agreed, granting the insurer’s motion for summary judgment.  On appeal, the Tenth Circuit assumed “that [Lyons] waited too long to notify Lexington,” but Judge Robert E. Bacharach nonetheless reversed, holding that Lexington had failed to show substantial prejudice.

Under Kansas law, an insurer can show prejudice by “presenting evidence that (1) its ability to investigate the claim has been lost; or (2) opportunities to negotiate settlement have been lost; or (3) opportunities to defend have been lost.”  According to the Court of Appeals, “to demonstrate prejudice, the insurer must show that it would have handled some aspect of the investigation, discovery or defense differently, and that with this change, [the insurer] could have either defeated the underlying claims or settled the underlying claims for a lower sum than for what the insureds settled.”

Lexington first argued prejudice from a lost opportunity to independently investigate before Lyons began remediation.  The court noted, however, that Lexington had independently inspected the mine and had failed to come forward with specific proof of how its investigation was hampered by the delay.  Lexington next argued prejudice in connection with the remediation effort, contending that had lost the opportunity to provide input to Lyons on how to resolve the water inflow problem.  That was equally unavailing; according to the opinion, Lexington “did not present evidence on how this input would have affected the remedial efforts [and in] the ansence of this evidence, a reasonable jury could conclude that Lexington failed to prove prejudice from the inability to participate in [Lyons’] remediation efforts.

Finally, Lexington urged “underwriting prejudice,” arguing that “the delay prevented a meaningful evaluation of  risk during the underwriting of the renewal policies [and that] earlier notice could have led to cancelation, non-renewal, or amendment” of the contracts of insurance that it had issued.  This failed to impress the panel as well because “the record contains no evidence that Lexington would have done anything differently had [Lyons] presented timely notice.”  In sum, therefore, Judge Bacharach reversed because he held that while “[t]he fact-finder could infer prejudice, [it] could also have found the opposite.”

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Cozen O'Connor | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Cozen O'Connor
Contact
more
less

Cozen O'Connor on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):
hide

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.

Security

JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at info@jdsupra.com. In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at: info@jdsupra.com.

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.
Feedback? Tell us what you think of the new jdsupra.com!