In product liability litigation, the determinants of causation between an agent and a disease are frequently a critical issue. In 1965 Sir Austin Bradford Hill, a British epidemiologist and statistician, delivered a speech to the Royal Society of Medicine in which he presented a list of what are often referred to as the Bradford Hill criteria. With increasing frequency, state and federal courts mention these criteria when discussing the admissibility of epidemiological evidence, however, they provide limited analysis of them. In view of this limited analysis by counsel and the courts, it seems appropriate to explore the significance of the Bradford Hill criteria—if any—in consideration of the admissibility of epidemiological evidence on the issue of causation.
Bradford Hill’s list was an expansion of one offered previously in the landmark U.S. Surgeon General’s Report on Smoking and Health (1964). Hill himself never labeled the criteria as such.
Originally published in the Thomas Jefferson Law Review Vol. 35:2.
Please see full article below for more information.
Firefox recommends the PDF Plugin for Mac OS X for viewing PDF documents in your browser.
We can also show you Legal Updates using the Google Viewer; however, you will need to be logged into Google Docs to view them.
Please choose one of the above to proceed!
LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.