The Bradford Hill Criteria: The Forgotten Predicate

Introduction -

In product liability litigation, the determinants of causation between an agent and a disease are frequently a critical issue. In 1965 Sir Austin Bradford Hill, a British epidemiologist and statistician, delivered a speech to the Royal Society of Medicine in which he presented a list of what are often referred to as the Bradford Hill criteria. With increasing frequency, state and federal courts mention these criteria when discussing the admissibility of epidemiological evidence, however, they provide limited analysis of them. In view of this limited analysis by counsel and the courts, it seems appropriate to explore the significance of the Bradford Hill criteria—if any—in consideration of the admissibility of epidemiological evidence on the issue of causation.

Bradford Hill’s list was an expansion of one offered previously in the landmark U.S. Surgeon General’s Report on Smoking and Health (1964). Hill himself never labeled the criteria as such.

Originally published in the Thomas Jefferson Law Review Vol. 35:2.

Please see full article below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Topics:  Bradford Hill Criteria, Causation, Daubert Standards, Epidemiological Evidence, Evidence

Published In: Civil Procedure Updates, Personal Injury Updates, Products Liability Updates

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Dinsmore & Shohl LLP | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »