The California Supreme Court Holds That Sudden and Accidental Pollution Need Only Be a "Substantial Factor" to Trigger Insurance Coverage


The California Supreme Court just handed down another major decision in favor of policyholders in the Stringfellow Acid Pits litigation. A few months ago in that litigation, the California Court of Appeal ruled in favor of stacking policy limits. Earlier this week, the state’s high court ruled that policyholders need only establish that sudden and accidental pollution was a “substantial factor in causing indivisible property damage” to defeat the application of a pollution exclusion with a “sudden and accidental” exception. State of California v. Allstate Ins. Co., S14988 (Mar. 9, 2009).

Please see full newsletter for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:


Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:

Sign up to create your digest using LinkedIn*

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.

Already signed up? Log in here

*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.