The D.C. Circuit Empowers Relators in Qui Tam Actions in United States ex rel. Schweizer v. Océ N.V.

by Saul Ewing LLP
Contact

As discussed in the March 2012 edition of the White Collar Watch, the case of United States ex rel. Schweizer v. Océ N.V. highlights the tension between the interests of qui tam relators and the United States Department of Justice (“DOJ”) when it comes to settling qui tam actions.  As of our March edition, the case was pending before the Court of Appeals of the D.C. Circuit on the question whether the DOJ could settle a qui tam action over the objection of a relator without the court reviewing the reasonableness of the settlement agreement.  On April 20, 2012, the D.C. Circuit held that the DOJ could not exercise unfettered discretion.  Lower courts must examine the reasonableness of a settlement agreement reached in a qui tam action.  See United States ex rel. Schweizer v. Océ N.V., No. 11-7030, 2012 WL 1372219 (D.C. Cir. Apr. 20, 2012).

By way of background, Stephanie Schweizer and Nancy Vee filed a qui tam action in April 2006 against their former employer, Océ N.V. (“Océ”).  Schweizer’s job responsibilities required her to monitor Océ’s supply contracts to provide copying and printing products to the government.  Schweizer claimed that she discovered in early 2005 that Océ had offered significant discounts to private sector customers without passing the savings to the government as required.  After Schweizer reported her concern internally, Océ terminated her because she “refused to follow orders” and “ignored the chain of command.”  (Schweizer included a claim of retaliation in her complaint.)  Initially, the United States declined to intervene.  In 2009, Océ, Schweizer, Vee, and the United States attempted to negotiate a settlement.  Océ offered to pay the United States $1.2 million, plus post-settlement interest.  The United States agreed to pay 19 percent of this amount to Schweizer and Vee.  All parties except Schweizer agreed to accept these terms. 

When the negotiations broke down, the United States first intervened, and then moved to dismiss the case with prejudice.  The DOJ cited its unlimited authority to settle and dismiss qui tam complaints in taking this action.  Schweizer objected on the ground that the lower court should review and reject the settlement as unreasonable.

Section 3730(c)(2)(B) of the False Claims Act (“FCA”) requires district courts to hold a hearing to determine whether settlements are “fair, adequate, and reasonable under all circumstances” and permits dismissal “over the relator’s objection as long as the relator has been notified of the motion to dismiss and given an opportunity to be heard on the motion.”  The lower court in Schweizer held a hearing but declined to rule on the reasonableness of the settlement.  Instead, the court noted that there was a “serious question” regarding the constitutionality of requiring a hearing and court approval of a settlement.  The lower court reasoned that the executive, rather than the judicial, branch traditionally controls the decision whether to settle.  The lower court also reasoned that the DOJ had “unfettered dismissal power.”  The lower court proceeded to grant the motion to dismiss all claims, including Schweizer’s retaliation claim.

In its appellate decision recently handed down, the D.C. Circuit reversed.  It ruled that lower courts must conduct a hearing to determine whether proposed settlements of qui tam actions are “fair, adequate, or reasonable under all circumstances” if the relator objects.  The court stated:

"Section 3730(c)(2)(B) contains no opt-out clause for rare cases or unusual circumstances.  It does not permit the Attorney General to decide when there shall be a hearing on the settlement:  the statute says that the government may settle a matter over a relator’s objection if the court holds a hearing and finds the proposed settlement reasonable.  The meaning is clear.  The government may not settle a case when the relator objects unless the court approves the settlement."

The D.C. Circuit also reversed the lower court’s dismissal of Schweizer’s retaliation claim, finding that a jury could find that Schweizer was fired at least in part because of her protected activity.

The D.C. Circuit’s ruling will provide relators’ counsel with additional leverage in their settlement negotiations with the government.  DOJ can no longer “strong-arm” a settlement without judicial review.  This new arrow in the relators’ quiver will require the government instead to engage in more diplomatic efforts to resolve even frivolous claims.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Saul Ewing LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Saul Ewing LLP
Contact
more
less

Saul Ewing LLP on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):
hide

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.

Security

JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at info@jdsupra.com. In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at: info@jdsupra.com.

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.
Feedback? Tell us what you think of the new jdsupra.com!