The Devil is in the Details of Your Debt Collection Case


Midland Funding

I recently had a trial against a junk debt buyer that had an interesting twist that I thought could be helpful to those facing debt collection lawsuits from debt buyers like Midland Funding, Unifund, Portfolio Recovery, or one of the other many companies out there.

In evaluating a case for trial I always take time to review all of the documents disclosed by the debt in support of their case.  I check account numbers on each document and cross reference them with each of the other document.  Are they the same?  I also check things like balance owed, interest rates, addresses, and any other information that you would think should be consistent throughout the documents.

Reviewing the details in each document will often result in you finding that the information that the debt buyer has submitted in support of its case often does no such thing.

In one of my most recent cases the junk debt buyer had submitted an affidavit from an employee of the alleged original creditor.  An affidavit is a written, sworn, notarized statement by a person that attests to some fact.  In my particular case the affidavit was submitted from the original creditor for the purpose of verifying that the documents being submitted from the original creditor were true and accurate.

But in reviewing the affidavit I immediately noticed a big problem (for them).  The name of the person who signed the affidavit was not the same as the person who was named in the affidavit.  And to add to their troubles the document was actually notarized.  When a notary signs and stamps a document they are stating that the person who signed the affidavit is who they say they are and are further the person referenced in the affidavit.

So, in this case we had an affidavit of Jane Doe (not the real name) that was signed by John Doe, and the notary had signed off on the entire thing.

Having a fraudulent affidavit causes big problems for the junk debt buyer trying to prove its case.  Especially in light of the fact that the affidavit in this case was being submitted to attest to the accuracy of the documents.  Hard to do when the affidavit itself has some huge errors.

The point of this post is to read over the documents carefully.  The small details you find could impact your debt collection case in large ways.

Photo Credit: Steve Hanna


Written by:

Published In:

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© John Skiba, Skiba Law Group, PLC | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »

All the intelligence you need, in one easy email:

Great! Your first step to building an email digest of JD Supra authors and topics. Log in with LinkedIn so we can start sending your digest...

Sign up for your custom alerts now, using LinkedIn ›

* With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name.