The Devil You Know? Which is Better, EPA Enforcement or Citizen Enforcement?

more+
less-
more+
less-

The Devil You Know? Which is Better, EPA Enforcement or Citizen Enforcement?

Last month, I noted that shrinking EPA budgets would lead to greater focus on citizen enforcement.  This week, an article in Law360 concerning EPA’s draft 2014-2018 strategic plan has driven that message home.  While talking about increased use of technology to monitor compliance more efficiently – all well and good and certainly for real – the strategic plan acknowledges a likely significant decrease in the number of enforcement actions to be brought by EPA.  We’re talking an almost 50% decrease.

Now, I’ve long been an advocate of focusing on outcomes.  More enforcement doesn’t necessarily mean a cleaner environment.  Lower emissions mean a cleaner environment.  If that can happen with zero enforcement, I’d hope we’d all cheer.  However, we’re not quite in that halcyon situation.

What’s going to be the result of the combination of more transparent electronic reporting and fewer EPA enforcement resources?  I’d put my money on more citizen enforcement.  Given a choice between dealing with EPA and DOJ counsel or counsel for an NGO bringing a citizen suit, I know which I’d choose.  Of course, the GOP in Congress appears to have the votes to continue to starve EPA’s budget, but they don’t have the votes to amend environmental laws to cut back on citizen suit provisions.

Voila, a result with which no one is happy.

- See more at: http://www.lawandenvironment.com/#sthash.2t9lN8Cg.dpuf

The Devil You Know? Which is Better, EPA Enforcement or Citizen Enforcement?

Last month, I noted that shrinking EPA budgets would lead to greater focus on citizen enforcement.  This week, an article in Law360 concerning EPA’s draft 2014-2018 strategic plan has driven that message home.  While talking about increased use of technology to monitor compliance more efficiently – all well and good and certainly for real – the strategic plan acknowledges a likely significant decrease in the number of enforcement actions to be brought by EPA.  We’re talking an almost 50% decrease.

Now, I’ve long been an advocate of focusing on outcomes.  More enforcement doesn’t necessarily mean a cleaner environment.  Lower emissions mean a cleaner environment.  If that can happen with zero enforcement, I’d hope we’d all cheer.  However, we’re not quite in that halcyon situation.

What’s going to be the result of the combination of more transparent electronic reporting and fewer EPA enforcement resources?  I’d put my money on more citizen enforcement.  Given a choice between dealing with EPA and DOJ counsel or counsel for an NGO bringing a citizen suit, I know which I’d choose.  Of course, the GOP in Congress appears to have the votes to continue to starve EPA’s budget, but they don’t have the votes to amend environmental laws to cut back on citizen suit provisions.

Voila, a result with which no one is happy.

- See more at: http://www.lawandenvironment.com/#sthash.2t9lN8Cg.dpuf

Last month, I noted that shrinking EPA budgets would lead to greater focus on citizen enforcement.  This week, an article in Law360 concerning EPA’s draft 2014-2018 strategic plan has driven that message home.  While talking about increased use of technology to monitor compliance more efficiently – all well and good and certainly for real – the strategic plan acknowledges a likely significant decrease in the number of enforcement actions to be brought by EPA.  We’re talking an almost 50% decrease.

Now, I’ve long been an advocate of focusing on outcomes.  More enforcement doesn’t necessarily mean a cleaner environment.  Lower emissions mean a cleaner environment.  If that can happen with zero enforcement, I’d hope we’d all cheer.  However, we’re not quite in that halcyon situation.

What’s going to be the result of the combination of more transparent electronic reporting and fewer EPA enforcement resources?  I’d put my money on more citizen enforcement.  Given a choice between dealing with EPA and DOJ counsel or counsel for an NGO bringing a citizen suit, I know which I’d choose.  Of course, the GOP in Congress appears to have the votes to continue to starve EPA’s budget, but they don’t have the votes to amend environmental laws to cut back on citizen suit provisions.

Voila, a result with which no one is happy.

 

Topics:  Citizen Suits, Enforcement, EPA

Published In: Environmental Updates

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Foley Hoag LLP - Environmental Law | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »