The Difference between the Duty to Defend and the Duty to Reimburse: What Policyholders Need to Know

Lynda Bennett, Eric Jesse
Lowenstein Sandler LLP
Contact
LinkedIn
Facebook
X
Send
Embed

Lowenstein Sandler LLP

In this episode of “Don’t Take No for an Answer,” hosts Lynda A. Bennett and Eric Jesse of Lowenstein’s Insurance Recovery Group discuss the difference between a duty to defend versus a duty to reimburse. They explain why policyholders may intentionally choose one option over the other, what each option covers, and how much say in choice of counsel and legal strategy a policyholder maintains under each.

Speakers:

Lynda A. Bennett, Partner and Chair, Insurance Recovery
Eric Jesse, Partner, Insurance Recovery

Send Print Report

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Lowenstein Sandler LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Lowenstein Sandler LLP
Lowenstein Sandler LLP
Contact
more
less

Lowenstein Sandler LLP on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign Up Log in
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide