The Efficacy of Using Independent Experts in Dispute Resolution Clauses – Are they Practical for Complex Disputes?

Hogan Lovells
Contact

In the recent decision of Onslow Salt Pty Ltd v Buurabalayji Thalanyji Aboriginal Corporation [2018] FCAFC 118 (‘Onslow v BTAC’) the full bench of the Federal Court dismissed an appeal regarding the Federal Court’s first instance decision refusing to stay proceedings in the matter.1 The primary judge refused to stay proceedings despite the plaintiff not following the requirements of a dispute resolution clause included in a Deed that specified the use of an independent expert to resolve disputes between the parties. Although it is a well established principle that parties should be held to their agreed dispute resolution procedures, this decision highlights the exceptional circumstances where a court may refuse a stay and depart from the commercial bargain struck between the parties to an agreement.

Please see full publication below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Hogan Lovells | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Hogan Lovells
Contact
more
less

Hogan Lovells on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide