The “Fax” Don’t Add Up for Coverage

more+
less-

The California Court of Appeal, Second Appellate District, has held that the receipt of unsolicited faxes is not covered as “advertising injury” or “property damage” for insurance purposes. State Farm General Insurance Company v. JT’s Frame, Inc., 10 C.D.O.S. 1162 (January 27, 2010). Fax blasts (the sending of unsolicited faxes) that do not contain personal information do not violate a right to privacy, and therefore are not an advertising injury. In addition, because the practice of fax blasting is intentional, rather than accidental, any resulting property damage is not covered by insurance.

Please see full newsletter below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Published In: Civil Remedies Updates, General Business Updates, Insurance Updates, Personal Injury Updates, Privacy Updates

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »