US v. Home Shopping Network Inc. (1999)

The FTC takes unsubstantiated product claims very seriously.

more+
less-

Home Shopping Network agreed to pay a 1.1 million dollar fine for violating an earlier consent agreement with the FTC. According to the FTC, Home Shopping made unsubstantiated efficacy claims for products designed to help consumers stop smoking, lose weight, and similar activities. Although the commission accepted the consent decree, one commissioner wrote separately to stress that home shopping was a recidivist. The action that gave rise to the fine was also the subject of the earlier consent decree. In this commissioner’s view, the fine was not an adequate deterrent to the behavior.

Full case and case summary also available online at: http://www.mlmlegal.com/legal-cases/US_v_HomeShoppingNetworkInc-1999.php

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Reference Info:Federal, 11th Circuit, Florida | United States


DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Babener & Associates | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

more+
less-

Babener & Associates on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:

Sign up to create your digest using LinkedIn*

*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.
×
Loading...
×
×