The recent decision of the European Court of Justice relating to Google and the "right to be forgotten", enabling citizens from the European Union to request search engines operating in Europe to delete, or not to show, certain indexed links, has gone viral.
Since the ruling many journalists, commentators and lawyers have written both about the benefits and disadvantages of the decision and the impact it may have in Europe and globally. However, in the midst of the gale force winds of commentary whipped up by the Google case and the resultant frenzy over privacy rights and the "right to be forgotten", we should pause and ask ourselves: just how ground-breaking is this decision?
This landmark case began in 2010 when a lawyer named Mario Costeja González complained to the Spanish Data Protection Agency that Google had interfered with his privacy by indexing pages from a Spanish newspaper that contained information about Mr González's home being repossessed 16 years ago for outstanding tax debts. Mr González wanted the links removed from Google's indexed search results.
Please see full alert below for more information.
Firefox recommends the PDF Plugin for Mac OS X for viewing PDF documents in your browser.
We can also show you Legal Updates using the Google Viewer; however, you will need to be logged into Google Docs to view them.
Please choose one of the above to proceed!
LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.
Topics: Australia, Cybersecurity, Data Controller, Data Protection, EU, EU Data Protection Laws, Google, Popular, Privacy Laws, Right to Be Forgotten, Right to Privacy, Search Engines
Published In: Civil Remedies Updates, Communications & Media Updates, Constitutional Law Updates, International Trade Updates, Privacy Updates
DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.
© DLA Piper | Attorney Advertising