In This Issue:

- Franchisor Uses Uniform Domain-Name Dispute-Resolution Policy To Obtain Control Over Infringing Domain:

A franchisor whose trademark was being infringed in a domain name recently obtained transfer of the domain to its control through a Uniform Domain-Name Dispute-Resolution Policy (“UDRP”) arbitration action.

- Court Holds Former Franchisee In Contempt For Failing To Comply With Temporary Restraining Order:

In Ledo Pizza System, Inc. v. Singh, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 46906 (D. Md. Apr. 3, 2014), a federal court in Maryland granted a franchisor’s motion for contempt against a former franchisee who failed to comply with a temporary restraining order prohibiting his continued operation of a pizza franchise following termination.

- Class Certification Denied In Customer’s Federal Lawsuit Regarding Unsolicited Text Messages:

A federal court in California denied class certification to a customer who received an unwanted text message from a promotional campaign by a franchisee.

- Court Holds That Franchisor May Be Liable For Data Breach At Franchised Location:

A federal court recently denied the motion of Wyndham Hotels & Resorts to dismiss a complaint brought by the Federal Trade Commission for unfair or deceptive acts or practices based on breaches of the property management computer system used by Wyndham and its franchisees.

- Georgia Federal District Court Rules That Franchisor And A Related Entity May Be A “Joint Enterprise” Under Federal Wage And Hour Law:

A federal district court in Georgia has conditionally certified a class of plaintiffs in a collective Fair Labor Standards Act wage and hour action brought against…

- California Federal Court Denies Franchisee’s Preliminary Injunction Motion To Prevent Franchisor’s Arbitration Of Dispute:

A federal district court in California recently denied a franchisee’s motion for a preliminary injunction to prevent a franchisor from proceeding with arbitration, finding that the arbitration…

- Court Enforces Noncompete After Expiration:

In Anytime Fitness, LLC v. Edinburgh Fitness, LLC, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 50337 (D. Minn. Apr. 11, 2014), a federal court in Minnesota enjoined...

- Federal Court In California Denies Motion Of Franchisee’s Supplier To Intervene In Franchisor’s Action Against The Franchisee:

A federal district court in California this month denied a restaurant foodservice supplier’s motion to intervene in a franchisor’s action to collect amounts owed by a former franchisee.

Please see full Report below for more Information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Topics:  Arbitration, Class Action, Class Certification, Compliance, Contempt, Contests & Promotions, Data Breach, Data Protection, Domain Names, Employee Rights, Employer Liability Issues, FLSA, Franchises, Franchisors, Internet, Restraining Orders, Termination, Texting, Trademark Litigation, Trademarks, UDAAP, UDRP, Wage and Hour, Wages, Wyndham

Published In: Civil Procedure Updates, Franchise Updates

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Gray Plant Mooty | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »

CONNECT

Gray Plant Mooty (GPM) is recognized as one of the leading corporate law firms in Minnesota and one... View Profile »


Follow Gray Plant Mooty:

Reporters on Deadline