The Hett Impact: Residential Home Builders Beware


A new decision by the Kansas Supreme Court drastically alters the legal landscape for claims against residential home builders. David v. Hett, No. 98,416, Kan., (Kan. Dec. 30, 2011). Click here to read the full decision. The Court has summarily abolished the economic loss doctrine ("ELD") as a defense long-used by contractors against tort-based claims like negligence, breach of implied warranty, and misrepresentation. Kansas homeowners may now proceed to trial using theories based in both contract and tort law, if they plead and establish a tort-based duty arising independently from their contract with the builder.

The implications are potentially significant. Seemingly, a homeowner party can now seek all damages proximately caused by an alleged negligent act by the builder, possibly including punitive damages if the facts warrant such a claim. Also, the statute of limitations that would time-bar such claims does not begin to run until the date the damage is first reasonably ascertainable; previously the statute would run from the date of the alleged breach of contract, regardless whether there was knowledge of the breach.

For years before Hett, unless the defective construction caused bodily injury or injury to property beyond damage to the house itself, homeowners were limited to pursuing just contract-based claims. But Hett expressly overturns prior Kansas case law. In Hett, the Court examined the tortured history of the ELD around the country, as well as in Kansas, noting that it was originally applied only in product liability cases and was later expanded to other areas of law. In refusing to allow such an expansion of the defense in Kansas, the Court refers to the common situation that a homeowner is not an expert in construction and, by implication, should be given more protections under the law.

The Court's reasoning could potentially be applied and expanded by other Kansas courts to cases involving parties without a direct contract with the builder, to commercial builders, or to others in the construction industry as well.

For More Information

We will continue to monitor the fallout from the Hett decision. If you have any questions about it in the meantime, please contact a member of our Construction Law practice group.

Written by:

Published In:

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Polsinelli | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »

All the intelligence you need, in one easy email:

Great! Your first step to building an email digest of JD Supra authors and topics. Log in with LinkedIn so we can start sending your digest...

Sign up for your custom alerts now, using LinkedIn ›

* With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name.