The Internal Affairs Doctrine – California May Not Be Standing Alone

Delaware lawyers undoubtedly regard the Delaware Supreme Court’s decision in VantagePoint v. Examen, Inc., 871 A. 2d 1108 (Del. 2005) as the last word on the internal affairs doctrine. In that case, the Delaware Supreme Court held that the internal affairs doctrine trumps a California statute, Corp. Code § 2115, imposing specified provisions of the California General Corporation Law on foreign corporations whose most significant shareholder and business contacts are with California. The internal affairs doctrine provides that the internal affairs of a corporation are governed by the law of the state of incorporation.

Although I understand the position of Delaware attorneys vis-a-vis the decision of their highest court, I’m not convinced that California courts will follow suit. I’m also of the view that the list of items constituting internal affairs is by no means written in stone. Nonetheless, I’m mindful that many lawyers, including many California lawyers, express the view that California is out of step with other states in applying its corporate law to foreign corporations.

Please see full article below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Published In: Administrative Agency Updates, Business Organization Updates, Conflict of Laws Updates, Securities Updates

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »