The New Age Of Patent Enforcement In The United States: The Brave New World Post-AIA Is NOT First To File – It IS Post Grant Proceedings

by Downs Rachlin Martin PLLC
Contact

Sure, First-to-File is new here, but the rest of the world has been dealing with it forever and the sky has not fallen on technological innovation elsewhere.  And it won’t fall on it here either under a First-to-File system.

But consider patent enforcement for a moment if you will.  As a patent owner who wants to enforce, you do your diligence, analyze the infringing product, formulate an infringement theory based on a claim construction that supports the infringement while navigating around key prior art.  Perhaps you also do some more searching, just to try to avoid being blindsided by a clear anticipatory reference.  And having done all that, you know that when you file your complaint, you will be in Federal District Court and your patent will be presumed valid; meaning any attempt to prove your patent should not have been granted in the first place will require evidence of invalidity that rises to a level of clear and convincing, not just simply a preponderance (e.g. not just 51 percent against you).  Not only that, but the case will be heard by an Article III judge appointed by the President and vetted by Congress, and that judge will hold a claim construction hearing (Markman hearing) to determine the meaning of the claims based on a long line of well-established, litigation-based claim construction cases.  Then, when the judge decides what the claims mean, he or she will charge the jury to determine validity based on that clear and convincing evidence standard; a jury that often is not entirely sure why they are being asked to second guess the USPTO and the Examiner who granted the patent in the first place.  And maybe you even selected the court you are going to litigate in because it’s in your home town or has a history of favorable rulings for patent owners.

All in all, if you have confidence in your patent and litigation counsel, and some money to back it up, you have a pretty good reason to be confident that you will get a good result – trial, summary judgment or settlement.

But not so fast – things are not what they once were. Serve that complaint for patent infringement today and sometime in the next twelve months an odd looking, sixty page document, perhaps with a two hundred plus page “expert” declaration attached, shows up at your office.  You have been served with a copy of a petition to the USPTO, requesting that it institute a Post-Grant Proceeding against your patent to determine its validity; and what you thought you knew about enforcing your patent just went out the window.

The America Invents Act (“AIA”) brought us three new Post-Grant Proceedings:  Post-Grant Review, Inter Partes Review and the transitional program for Covered Business Method Patents Review.  In spite of only one actually being called “inter partes,” all are a form of inter partes trial in the USPTO in which the party opposing the patent has a full opportunity to participate and present evidence and witnesses.

So what changes?  For starters, assuming your case has not progressed very far, it is there is a greater possibility it will stayed.  Then, assuming that petition is granted – (out of about 150 petitions for IPR filed  since the law went into effect on September 16, 2012, as of March 1, thirteen had been decided with only one denied) – the validity of your patent is no longer going to be determined by a jury who may respect the Patent office, the claim construction is no longer determined by an Article III judge and… your issued patent no longer enjoys a presumption of validity.

In a Post Grant Proceeding, the validity of the claims will be determined by a panel of three Administrative Patent Judges, many of whom were hired by the USPTO in the last eighteen months.  That panel will both construe the claims and determine the validity – judge and jury all in one – and instead of a presumption of validity, your claims are now treated just like they were in the original prosecution:  Claim terms are given their “broadest reasonable construction” and a mere preponderance of the evidence is enough to invalidate.

Changes don’t stop there – the IPR and PGR proceedings are statutorily required in most cases to be resolved by the USPTO within twelve months of the petition being granted.  The Patent Office rules for these proceedings are extraordinarily complex and generally do not allow for extensions other than by agreement with the opposing party and even then, a number of important deadlines cannot be moved.  Discovery and depositions are extremely limited.  And if past experience with interferences is a guide, sanctions could be freely levied against those who don’t comply.

This can’t be you say!  Perhaps your patent was granted 10 years ago.  Maybe it has even been enforced before and declared valid by a Federal District Court, or even the Federal Circuit.  Sorry – new law, new rules – back to the patent office you go.  And by the way, the fact that the prior are relied on by the petitioner now was considered before by the examiner or a court doesn’t matter either if the petitioner is able to present a reasonable likelihood of being able to invalidate at least one claim of the patent (but at as mentioned above, so far only 1 of 13 failed to do that).

So what does this all mean.  First, patent owners who enforce should not panic, the sky still is not falling.  But don’t try to convince yourself that a Post Grant Proceeding can’t happen to you.  Learn what they are, how they work and how you can be best prepared to fight one off when it happens.  Because if you are a patent owner who actively enforces your patents, it is going to happen to you sooner or later.

In a series of following posts, I will discuss various aspect of how you can prepare before and after the petition is served on you; and things you might consider doing a bit differently during the initial prosecution to strengthen your patents to better defend against a Post Grant Proceeding.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Downs Rachlin Martin PLLC | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Downs Rachlin Martin PLLC
Contact
more
less

Downs Rachlin Martin PLLC on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):
hide

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.

Security

JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at info@jdsupra.com. In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at: info@jdsupra.com.

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.