In the absence of clear, direct guidance on whether a certain class of employee falls within an exemption to overtime laws, an employer takes a leap of faith in deciding to forego payment of overtime without seeking written clarification. The New Jersey Appellate Division has rendered an opinion in an area with sparse precedents to guide employers—how to apply the “good faith defense” in the context of an overtime claim by an auto mechanic where the employer’s practices had been reviewed during two separate New Jersey Department of Labor (“DOL”) audits. A failure to pay $9400 in overtime mushroomed to a total liability of $85,733.56 for the employer where the Appellate Division ruled that the employer could not point to the actions or statements of the DOL auditors as a bar to liability under the “good faith defense” set forth in N.J.S.A. § 34:11-56a25.2.
Reprinted with permission, copyrighted NJLJ, 12/17/12
Firefox recommends the PDF Plugin for Mac OS X for viewing PDF documents in your browser.
We can also show you Legal Updates using the Google Viewer; however, you will need to be logged into Google Docs to view them.
Please choose one of the above to proceed!
LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.
Civil Procedure Updates, Labor & Employment Law Updates
DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.
© Kevin O'Connor, Peckar & Abramson, P.C. | Attorney Advertising