The Reprecussions of Anonymous Juries


Although anonymous juries have been de rigueur in cases of national prominence, their use in routine matters is a recent trend. The Repercussions of Anonymous Juries examines the increasing use of anonymous juries and the constitutional implications they raise. The origins, history, and use of anonymous juries are explored, along with the benefits and drawbacks of anonymity.

An oft-overlooked facet of anonymous juries is the psychological consequences of anonymity. Are anonymous juries more likely to convict? Social science research suggests they are. Anonymity is a multifaceted issue balancing juror safety with a defendant's presumption of innocence. But hard choices cannot excuse the unpleasant reality that anonymity undermines the presumption of innocence.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Published In: Civil Procedure Updates, Civil Rights Updates, Constitutional Law Updates, Criminal Law Updates

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Christopher Keleher, The Keleher Appellate Law Group, LLC | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »