IX. COPYRIGHTS/VENUE/PERSONAL JURISDICTION
A. CASE LAW
1. U.S. Courts of Appeal
a. Brayton Purcell LLP v. Recordon & Recordon 606 F.3d 1124
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit held on May 28, 2010 that personal jurisdiction was established over a law firm whose Web site contained copyrighted material taken verbatim from another law firm’s Web site where the infringer’s Web site put the two firms in direct competition for clients, despite the fact that the two firms practiced in different geographical areas of California.
b. Chloé v. Queen Bee of Beverly Hills LLC 96 USPQ2d 1349
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit held on August 5, 2010 that defendant California resident’s contacts with New York are sufficient to subject him to personal jurisdiction under state’s “single-act” long-arm statute, since defendant shipped counterfeit “Chloé” handbag to purchaser in New York, and since defendant’s company operated interactive website offering handbags for sale to New York consumers, and shipped merchandise to New York on 52 other occasions.
Please see full chapter below for more information.
Firefox recommends the PDF Plugin for Mac OS X for viewing PDF documents in your browser.
We can also show you Legal Updates using the Google Viewer; however, you will need to be logged into Google Docs to view them.
Please choose one of the above to proceed!
LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.
Published In:
Civil Procedure Updates, Intellectual Property Updates
DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.
© Brooks Kushman P.C. | Attorney Advertising