The U.S. Supreme Court decided today that claims to isolated genomic DNA are not patentable subject matter and thus invalid. This decision rendered invalid patent claims owned by Myriad Genetics as well as thousands of patent claims of others to such molecules. However, Myriad’s claims to complementary DNA (cDNA) molecules were held to be valid.
In the decision, authored by Justice Thomas, the Court held that claims to isolated genomic DNA molecules fell squarely within the law of nature exception to patentable subject matter. According to the Court, Myriad found the location of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes, but that discovery, by itself, did not render the BRCA genes a “new...composition[s] of matter” under §101. The Court was not moved by Myriad’s argument that they undertook extensive effort to locate the gene sequences associated with an increased risk of breast cancer. The Court also rejected the argument that isolating DNA from the human genome severed chemical bonds and thereby created a non-naturally occurring molecule, pointing out that Myriad’s claims did not rely on the chemical changes that result from isolation. Instead, the claims focus on the genetic information encoded in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes. The Court also rejected the argument that the U.S. Patent and Trademark’s past practice of awarding gene patents was entitled to deference, pointing out that the U.S. government now argued to the Court that isolated genomic DNA was not patent eligible.
Please see full alert below for more information.
Firefox recommends the PDF Plugin for Mac OS X for viewing PDF documents in your browser.
We can also show you Legal Updates using the Google Viewer; however, you will need to be logged into Google Docs to view them.
Please choose one of the above to proceed!
LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.
Topics: AMP v Myriad, DNA, Gene Patenting, Human Genes, Myriad, Patent-Eligible Subject Matter, Patents, Product of Nature Doctrine, SCOTUS
Published In: Intellectual Property Updates, Science, Computers & Technology Updates
DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.
© Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C. | Attorney Advertising