The Supreme Court Strikes Down the Mercury and Air Toxics Standards

Latham & Watkins LLP
Contact

While the Court’s decision marks a symbolic defeat for EPA, it may not significantly alter power plant operators’ compliance efforts.

In a much anticipated decision delivered on the last day of the term, the Supreme Court struck down the Mercury and Air Toxics Standards, or MATS rule because EPA failed to consider costs in determining whether to regulate the power sector. For America’s coal-fired power plants, the decision in Michigan v. EPA may have a limited impact. The rule was not stayed during the four-year judicial review of the rule, and as a result retirement, fuel-switching and upgrade decisions have already been made at many facilities in response to MATS as well as other Clean Air Act (CAA) rules and these decisions may not be reversed due to the increased viability of natural gas-fired power generation.

Please see full publication below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Latham & Watkins LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Latham & Watkins LLP
Contact
more
less

Latham & Watkins LLP on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide