Third Circuit Remands Marcellus Shale Case Based on the Class Action Fairness Act's Local Controversy Exception


The Third Circuit recently clarified the home state and local controversy exceptions to the Class Action Fairness Act (CAFA), remanding proceedings in a case involving Marcellus Shale oil and gas leases to a Pennsylvania trial court.

Plaintiffs in Vodenichar v. Halcón Energy Properties, Inc. were various Pennsylvania-domiciled landowners in Mercer County, Pennsylvania, seeking to lease their oil and gas rights to Halcón (a Texas domiciliary), with the assistance of the defendant law firm Morascyzk & Polochak (M&P) (a Pennsylvania domiciliary) and defendant marketing company Co-eXprise (a Pennsylvania domiciliary). Halcón entered a letter of intent to lease up to 60,000 acres of oil and gas rights from the landowners, but ultimately accepted leases for only approximately half of the acreage, rejecting the balance of the leases. Plaintiffs are the landowners whose leases Halcón rejected.

Please see full alert below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Topics:  CAFA, Marcellus Shale, Mineral Leases, Oil & Gas, Shale Gas

Published In: Civil Procedure Updates, General Business Updates, Energy & Utilities Updates

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Schnader Harrison Segal & Lewis LLP | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »