Third Circuit Requires Affidavit of Merit in Products Liability Case Against Residential Homebuilder

In a case of first impression, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit affirmed the dismissal of design defect claims against a residential homebuilder under New Jersey’s Product Liability Act when the homeowner failed to comply with New Jersey’s Affidavit of Merit Statute (the Merit Statute). The December 13, 2013, holding in Calender v. NVR, Inc. t/a Ryan Homes has significant implications for the New Jersey construction industry and, more broadly, for businesses that employ licensed professionals whose alleged malpractice gives rise to claims against their employers.

The plaintiff, who fell while descending from his attic through an access panel, alleged that the homebuilder was liable under the Product Liability Act and other theories for defective architectural design, improper construction, and inadequate warnings. The Merit Statute mandates the early dismissal of negligence and malpractice claims against New Jersey licensed professionals if the plaintiff fails to serve, within 60 days of the defendants’ answer, an affidavit substantiating that there is a reasonable probability that the design professional was negligent.

The Merit Statute had not previously been applied to afford protection either to design claims under the Product Liability Act or directly to residential homebuilders that employ licensed professional architects. Both the trial court and Third Circuit determined that the Merit Statute applies to design claims against a homebuilder that, by their nature, implicate the professional judgment of its licensed professionals. The Merit Statute applies regardless of the legal theory asserted and whether the design architect or engineer is a named defendant. The Third Circuit also affirmed the ultimate summary judgment against plaintiffs on failure to warn claims, finding that the risk posed by an open attic access is open and obvious.

The Calender appellate and trial court opinions are available here.

Topics:  Architecture, Construction Litigation, Design Defects, Inadequate Warning, Professional Liability, Real Estate Market

Published In: Civil Procedure Updates, Construction Updates, Products Liability Updates, Professional Malpractice Updates

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Ballard Spahr LLP | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »