Third-Party Bad Faith Litigation – Insurers’ Attorney-Client Privilege and Work Product Doctrine Protections Limited by Tripartite Relationship in Underlying Liability Action


In what may be the continuation of a trend toward the erosion of the attorney-client privilege and work product doctrine in bad faith litigation, another court has held that an insurer’s communications with defense counsel retained for the insured in an underlying liability suit are discoverable and not subject to the attorney-client privilege or work product doctrine in a subsequent third-party bad faith lawsuit, this time under Georgia law. Camacho v. Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co., No. 1:11-CV-03111-AT., 2012 WL 6062029 (N.D. Ga., Dec. 3, 2012); see also In re XL Specialty, et al., 373 S.W.3d 46 (Tex. 2012) (communications between counsel for insurer and employer in workers’ compensation administrative case not privileged in subsequent bad faith lawsuit). In Camacho, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia (the District Court) rejected the insurer’s attorney-client privilege and work product doctrine arguments, (1) holding that the joint defense/common interest exception to the attorney-client privilege applies except for communications solely between the insurer and the insurer’s in-house claims counsel, (2) ordering the production of the insurer’s entire claims file despite the work product doctrine, subject to the redaction of only the mental impressions, conclusions, opinions or legal theories of the insurer’s in-house counsel and insurer’s claims representatives handling the file regarding the litigation, and (3) ordering the depositions of the insurer’s personnel to proceed.


Jesus Camacho, the surviving spouse of Stacey Camacho, and Lajean Nichols, as administratrix of the estate (plaintiffs), filed a state court wrongful death suit against Seung C. Park (Mr. Park), insured by Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company (the insurer), that ultimately resulted in a verdict in excess of policy limits against Mr. Park. Mr. Park assigned to plaintiffs his claims against the insurer for negligent and bad faith failure to settle the claim within policy limits. Plaintiffs, standing in the shoes of Mr. Park, filed a third-party bad faith suit against the insurer in the Northern District of Georgia, based on diversity jurisdiction.

Please see full alert below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Written by:

Published In:

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Cozen O'Connor | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »

All the intelligence you need, in one easy email:

Great! Your first step to building an email digest of JD Supra authors and topics. Log in with LinkedIn so we can start sending your digest...

Sign up for your custom alerts now, using LinkedIn ›

* With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name.