Time to answer complaint extended after Canon agrees to assert no more than 50 claims (down from 1,042 possible claims)

Canon Inc. v. Print-Rite N.A., Inc., et al.

Case Number: 1:14-cv-00540-DLC (Dkt. 16)

The consolidated defendants in this replacement toner infringement case requested an extension to the time to answer, in light of Canon’s agreement to limit the number of claims asserted to no more than 50.

 

Topics:  Canon, Patent Infringement, Patent Litigation, Patents

Published In: Civil Procedure Updates, Intellectual Property Updates

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Robins, Kaplan, Miller & Ciresi L.L.P. | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »