Top fashion legal topics – #3 3D Printers à la mode


As part of the series of posts on fashion related topics, we previously discussed about wearable technologies and franchising agreements while in this post we would better focus on an issue already touched in this previous post i.e. the issues originated by the friction between traditional IP rights and 3D printing technologies.

These technologies, apparently, influenced most illustrators dealing with the Milan Fashion Week: a fair amount if images, like this or this, depicts dresses created and manufactured, totally or partially, with 3D printers.

It could well be a matter of hype: designers love to get media attention and 3D printing technology is presently trendy. There are however a couple of circumstances that suggest to look at the phenomenon with some more attention.

First, materials. New materials stimulate new shapes and new solutions, which sooner or later cascade from the height of haute couture to everyday apparel. Second, allure. The adoption path of new technologies usually require some intermediate steps before they reach the masses. Catwalks are a perfect showcase.

It is therefore reasonable to expect a further push towards the diffusion of 3D printing technology. This will affect, inter alia, the fashion industry, which managed to keep a strong separation between different markets, from haute couture to pret a porter to mass market. A Gucci tailor made coat is not in the same league of an Emporio Armani coat, which again has nothing to do with a Zara coat.

Insert 3D printers and the corresponding possibility to add personalization to mass-market production and the above well-guarded boundaries start to blur.

Such a future could present interesting issues from the legal point of view: the fashion industry heavily relies on two pillars: trademarks and exclusivity. The personalization allowed by 3D printing technologies could change the meaning of exclusivity, thereby increasing even more the importance of the trademarks. In a world where everyone can afford a tailor-made (rectius: a 3D printer-made) dress, trademarks and brands will be crucial to identify the creations of top designers and stylists.

Then comes the need to protect the creations themselves against unauthorized copies; the diffusion of 3D printers could escalate these kind of conflicts, too, and involve new players, including the customers.

We will keep you posted of the developments, here and in our magazine Law-a-la-Mode.

Written by:

Published In:

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© DLA Piper | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »

All the intelligence you need, in one easy email:

Great! Your first step to building an email digest of JD Supra authors and topics. Log in with LinkedIn so we can start sending your digest...

Sign up for your custom alerts now, using LinkedIn ›

* With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name.