Toys R Us-Delaware, Inc. v. 44-45 Broadway Realty Co., LLC

Toys R Us-Delaware, Inc. v. 44-45 Broadway Realty Co., LLC Dismissal


Pryor Cashman has won dismissal of all claims brought against it client, 44-45 Broadway, by retail toy giant Toys “R” Us.

The dispute arose from a long-term commercial lease between 44-45 Broadway and Toys “R” Us for a large portion of a building owned by 44-45 Broadway and located in Times Square. Toys “R” Us operates its flagship store at the leased premises.

Under the 15 year lease, which was executed in 2000, Toys “R” Us was required to pay a portion of the building’s real estate tax liability, calculated as a percentage of the increase in taxes over the amount of taxes due during the first year of the lease. For 12 years, 44-45 Broadway sent to Toys “R” Us monthly invoices and biannual statements setting forth in detail the calculation of Toys “R” Us’s proportionate share of the building’s taxes, and for 12 years Toys “R” Us paid those invoices and its tax obligation without objection.

In 2011, for the first time, Toys “R” Us objected to the amount of taxes it was being invoiced, claiming that it should not have to pay its proportionate share of the building’s taxes to the extent that those taxes result from income the building receives from signs that do not belong to Toys “R” Us. Pryor Cashman’s client, 44-45 Broadway, rejected Toys “R” Us’s argument and refused to modify the methodology of calculating Toys “R” Us’s tax obligation.

In April 2012 Toys “R” Us brought suit against 44-45 Broadway in New York State Supreme Court in New York County, seeking damages for breach of contract in the amount of the taxes that Toys “R” Us allegedly had been overcharged during the course of the lease term, as well as a declaratory judgment that Toys “R” Us’s interpretation of the lease was the correct interpretation. In response, Pryor Cashman, on behalf of 44-45, Broadway moved to dismiss Toys “R” Us’s complaint.

On January 2, 2013, N.Y. Supreme Court Justice Ramos granted 44-45 Broadway’s motion in its entirety and dismissed the complaint, rejecting Toys “R” Us’s interpretation of the lease and finding that “the contractual obligation to pay a defined portion of real estate taxes imposed on the building has nothing to do with taxes imposed against signs or the income derived from those signs.”

Representing 44-45 Broadway from Pryor Cashman's Real Estate Litigation Group were Partner Todd Soloway, Chair of the group, Partner Eric Sherman and Litigation Associate Benjamin Akley.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Written by:

Published In:

Reference Info:Decision | State, 2nd Circuit, New York | United States

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Pryor Cashman LLP | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »

All the intelligence you need, in one easy email:

Great! Your first step to building an email digest of JD Supra authors and topics. Log in with LinkedIn so we can start sending your digest...

Sign up for your custom alerts now, using LinkedIn ›

* With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name.