Trademark Management and the New Generic Top Level Domains

by Nossaman LLP
Contact

Everyone navigates the Internet.  It is the new Grand Commons of society – the place for communication, commerce and information.  Web sites populate and inform the internet.  Every web site has a domain name such as Nossaman.com.  Domain names are crucial for identifying sources of services or products and have themselves become a commodity the rights to which generate expensive disputes.

In this context, in late 1998, the US Department of Commerce issued a so-called "White Paper" on the "Management of Internet Names and Addresses" which, among other purposes, hoped to address the conflict between trademark holders and domain name holders and the increasingly international and commercialized nature of the internet.1   The White Paper recognized a variety of business and geopolitical realities and recommended the creation of a private, non-profit entity to oversee the management of Top Level Domains (TLDs; also sometimes referred to as a "string" or "end-string") (e.g., .com, net, .gov, .info) which is now known as the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN).  ICANN went on to introduce a limited number of additional TLDs shortly after its formation in 1998 and again in 2004.

ICANN is poised to do so again – and this third wave of TLDs may well release the tempest.

In January 2012, ICANN began accepting applications for new generic Top Level Domains (gTLDs)2  having essentially removed most restrictions on the names of gTLDs. Now, ICANN will also allow so-called "dot brand" TLDs (i.e., .GUCCI).3


The "Trademark Dilemma"
The internet is global.  Branding and trademark protections are increasingly global.  Where an internet domain name uses a trademark or confusingly similar term, in order to vindicate its rights in a trademark, the trademark holder is left to wade through a mine-field of options (practical and legal), conflicting international protections, continued "fraudulent" protections, and forced arbitrations.  A TLD of .com, .net, or .org would not, by itself, drive a trademark holder to claim infringement.  Instead, it is the secondary domain identification that generally causes problems.4

While ICANN, as a private, non-profit entity manages the TLDs, the domain name registrars are for-profit.  In response to the trademark holder and other claims against domain name holders, the US asked the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) to develop a process and system for dispute resolution which became the Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP).  Addressing the issue to WIPO also acknowledged the reality that the internet was global and dispute resolution could not be addressed solely within the US.  We now have an overlapping "mesh" of so-called Rights Protection Mechanisms (RPMs).

Doubling our Troubles?
On June 13, 2012, ICANN released the new gTLD "Applied-For Strings."5   ICANN said it best:  "There are…only 22 ‘generics' in the domain name system right now, but that is all about to change."  The list includes about 2000 applications for TLD registry ranging from .ADULT to .GUCCI to .MEDICAL to .NIKE to .YOU and includes the use of non-Latin characters. 

In connection with the current list of "Applied for Strings," ICANN provided an objection period, currently extended to March 13, 2013.  During this period, interested parties may file objections to the approval of an application in 4 categories:

  1. A. String Confusion – The applied for gTLD string is confusingly similar to an existing TLD or to another applied-for gTLD string.  Delegating two or more similar TLDs could cause user confusion.
  2. Legal Rights – The applied-for gTLD string violates the legal rights of the objector (e.g., trademark registration).
  3. Limited Public Interest – The applied-for gTLD string contradicts generally accepted legal norms of morality and public order recognized under principles of international law.
  4. Community – There is substantial opposition to the gTLD application from a significant portion of the community which the gTLD string is targeting.

Following the objection period, disputed applications will proceed through the dispute resolution process (as designed by one of the ICANN dispute resolution service providers).

What To Do?
ICANN's new gTLDs and registry applications have gone significantly under-noticed by mid-sized businesses.  This is true even for many businesses that are based on branding or are web-based themselves.  However, there are mechanisms to protect branding, internet presence, and e-commerce operations.

1. gTLD Registry Application
Become a gTLD registry.  Not for the faint of heart, the application process is costly, involved, competitive, and subject to a variety of operational, technical and financial rules.  The gTLD registry is contractually obligated to ICANN to operate the gTLD in a secure and stable manner (including maintaining the data base of registered domain names within the TLD).  By contrast, a registrar (generally accredited by ICANN) is contractually obligated to the registry to register the domain names to registrants.  Notably, the "dot brand" gTLD registries endure heightened scrutiny and in some circumstances may assign the registry operations to a third-party.

2. gTLD Objection
As discussed, an interested party (i.e., business, current domain owner, trademark registrant) has until March 13, 2013 to file an objection and proceed through the dispute resolution process.

3. Trademark Clearinghouse
ICANN's efforts to address the continuing trademark dilemma and infringement posed by domain names now includes a Trademark Clearinghouse whereby a trademark owner can register their mark.  The Clearinghouse offers a few benefits: 

  • Sunrise period registration – the trademark owner may be allowed to defensively register their mark as a secondary domain identification within a new gTLD during a Sunrise period (before the domain is available to the general public).  With early priority access to registration, the expectation is that the trademark owner will secure potentially infringing domain names for themselves and avoid later and potentially costly legal claims to police and protect their mark.
  • Trademark Notice – the domain registrant will be provided notice of a trademark registered with the Clearinghouse and, later, to the trademark registrant, and
  • Uniform Rapid Suspension (URS) – a swift, light-weight dispute resolution process explained below.

4. "Defensive" new gTLD domain registration
Whether through a Sunrise period or thereafter, a trademark owner might proactively, though defensively, register their domain to prevent another registrant from doing so.

5. Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP)
Think of the UDRP as contractual arbitration.  On registration, each domain name applicant submits to the jurisdiction of the UDRP in the domain name agreement as required by ICANN (through the registrar).6   The process includes several key elements which a complainant must establish to challenge a domain name registration:

  • the domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark; and
  • the domain name registrant has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the domain name; and
  • the domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith.7

What constitutes bad faith is more art than science and is viewed from a variety of perspectives; however, ICANN has identified several facts to be considered.8

6. Uniform Rapid Suspension (URS)
The Uniform Rapid Suspension service allows the complainant to quickly address a clear-cut case of trademark infringement under a new gTLD with processes which are similar to those of the UDRP.  However, there are key differences:

  • there is a greater burden of proof by the complainant,
  • additional defenses exist for the domain name registrant, and
  • the sole remedy for a complainant is a temporary suspension of a domain (until the expiration of the registration or other legal transfer, whichever comes first).

7. Post Delegation Dispute Resolution Procedure (PDDRP)
Again, similar in process to the UDRP, the Post Delegation Dispute Resolution Procedure (PDDRP) is aimed at the gTLD registry (rather than a domain name registrant) and serves to address violations by the registry that violate the stable and secure directive for each registry or affirmative conduct which contributes to trademark abuses.

8. Appeal to Local Law
Following any of the dispute resolution processes, the complainant may then appeal an unsatisfactory decision to local national, regional, or state laws to force ICANN or a registrar to transfer a domain name (e.g., US "Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act"9).  Of course, in many jurisdictions, the complainant may apply to the local courts before submitting to the ICANN processes.

Should we worry that this flood of new gTLDs will create a tsunami of trademark abuses and infringement?  According to WIPO current registration statistics, at 78% of outstanding domains, ".com" remains king.  Simply, the consumer has not adopted the previous gTLDs (that created early concern of incremental abuses) including:  .net (10%), .org (6%), or even the newer .xxx (.04%).  Depending on the business, product, service, sales channels, or reliance on the internet, businesses may have more or less concern about the new gTLDs.  At a minimum, they cannot be ignored.  And, we have a variety of approaches and tools to address issues. 

For more information on gTLDs, Trademark Clearinghouse registration, Nossaman's IP audit services, and Nossaman's Intellectual Property & Media Practice Group, please contact Thomas Dover.



1 US Dept of Commerce, "Management of Internet Names and Addresses" Docket No.: 980212036-8146-02

2 New Internet Name Rule Opens Door to Huge Changes. Voice of America, June 20, 2011.

3 Internet minders OK vast expansion of domain names, Associated Press, June 20, 2011.

4 "Top Level Domains" (TLDs) and "generic Top Level Domains" (gTLDs) indicate the portion of an internet domain name following the last "." (i.e., .com, .net, etc.).  Secondary domain name is the primary portion of an internet domain name and is the subject of most pre-2012 gTLDs trademark disputes and "Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy" (UDRP) actions (e.g., in ‘www.example.com,' example is the secondary domain name).

5 http://newgtlds.icann.org/en/program-status/application-results/strings-1200utc-13jun12-en

6 The Management of Internet Names and Addresses: Intellectual Property Issues, 30 April 1999. http://www.wipo.int/export/sites/www/amc/en/docs/report-final1.pdf

7 http://www.icann.org/en/help/dndr/udrp/policy

8 While not exclusive, UDRP policy defines "bad faith" as including "squatting" (acquiring a domain name for the purpose of selling) and "siphoning" (attempting to attract, for commercial gain, users to a site that is confusingly similar to another's trademark).

9 The Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act (ACPA), 15 U.S.C. § 1125(d), is an American law enacted in 1999 and that established a cause of action for registering, trafficking in, or using a domain name confusingly similar to, or dilutive of, a trademark or personal name.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Nossaman LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Nossaman LLP
Contact
more
less

Nossaman LLP on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):
hide

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.

Security

JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at info@jdsupra.com. In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at: info@jdsupra.com.

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.