Trial Practice Update

Judge’s Disparagement of Attorney Warrants Reversal: The New York Court of Appeals granted a new trial in the appeal by a defendant convicted of attempted car-jacking. The basis for the conviction’s reversal was the repeated comments made by the trial judge about defense counsel in front of the jury. At various times, including while cutting off defense counsel’s cross-examination of a prosecution witness, the judge referred to the lawyer’s conduct as “clown”-like and “silly.” The Court of Appeals found that these comments tainted the jury’s verdict and violated the defendant’s due process right to a fair trial. Of greater general applicability, the Court of Appeals took the opportunity to set forth the desired manner by which a trial court should reprimand counsel for perceived misconduct. It advised that the matter should be addressed directly with counsel outside the presence of the jury. Moreover, should the judge recognize that any comments made in front of the jury might be inappropriate, the court should give the jury a curative instruction. See People v. Leggett, 76 A.D. 3d 860, 908 N.Y. S. 2d 172 (Sept. 14, 2010)

Please see full article below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Published In: Civil Procedure Updates, Criminal Law Updates

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »