Trivedi Decision Calls Validity of Many Existing Arbitration Agreements Into Serious Question

more+
less-

In the past 15 years, it has become common for employers to require employees to agree, as a condition of employment, to resolve disputes regarding employment through binding arbitration instead of jury trials. Employees, who typically prefer to submit their claims to a jury of their peers, have responded by challenging the enforceability of mandatory arbitration policies. In response to the employee challenges, state and federal courts have issued a series of decisions defining the terms under which arbitration agreements may be enforceable, and declining to enforce those agreements deemed inherently unfair or one-sided. A new decision issued by the California Court of Appeal last month further clarifies the rules regarding arbitration and calls into question the validity of many existing arbitration agreements and policies utilized by employers.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.


DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Hopkins & Carley | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

more+
less-

Hopkins & Carley on:

JD Supra Readers' Choice 2016 Awards
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:

Sign up to create your digest using LinkedIn*

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.

Already signed up? Log in here

*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.
×
Loading...
×
×