Recent press reports detailing large penalties paid by a U.K. bank in connection with its violations of U.S. restrictions on financial dealings with Iran and Sudan underscore the cost of the violations - in both financial and public relations terms - to a financial institution caught in such circumstances. Similar, although apparently less egregious, actions by ABN AMRO were penalized in 2005. While these kinds of actions are presumably not common, U.S. banks that routinely clear offshore transactions through correspondent accounts held by other banks, or that have overseas branches or affiliates, may want to consider protective measures to guard against such violations.
Please see full article below for more information.
Firefox recommends the PDF Plugin for Mac OS X for viewing PDF documents in your browser.
We can also show you Legal Updates using the Google Viewer; however, you will need to be logged into Google Docs to view them.
Please choose one of the above to proceed!
LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.
Published In:
Finance & Banking Updates, International Law & Trade Updates
DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.
© Thompson Coburn LLP | Attorney Advertising