U.K. Bank Penalized for Violating U.S. Economic Sanctions; U.S. Banks May Want to Consider Protective Actions


Recent press reports detailing large penalties paid by a U.K. bank in connection with its violations of U.S. restrictions on financial dealings with Iran and Sudan underscore the cost of the violations - in both financial and public relations terms - to a financial institution caught in such circumstances. Similar, although apparently less egregious, actions by ABN AMRO were penalized in 2005. While these kinds of actions are presumably not common, U.S. banks that routinely clear offshore transactions through correspondent accounts held by other banks, or that have overseas branches or affiliates, may want to consider protective measures to guard against such violations.

Please see full article below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Written by:

Published In:

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Thompson Coburn LLP | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »

All the intelligence you need, in one easy email:

Great! Your first step to building an email digest of JD Supra authors and topics. Log in with LinkedIn so we can start sending your digest...

Sign up for your custom alerts now, using LinkedIn ›

* With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name.