Under ERISA, Communications with In-House Counsel Before a Final Claims Decision are Not Privileged and are Subject to Discovery to Show a Conflict of Interest


The Ninth Circuit for the first time addresses whether the fiduciary exception applies to insurance companies in the ERISA context. In an ERISA case, a claimant is entitled to conduct discovery regarding communications between claims handlers and in-house counsel in an attempt to determine whether the insurer’s decision was improperly influenced by a conflict of interest.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Published In: Insurance Updates