United States Supreme Court Rules Online TV Streaming Service Violates Copyright Law

by LeClairRyan
Contact

On June 25, 2014 the Supreme Court of the United States in ABC v. Aereo, Inc., No. 13-461 (S.Ct. June 25, 2014), in an opinion delivered by Justice Breyer, ruled that an online television streaming service that allows subscribers to watch television programs over the Internet at about the same time programs are broadcast over the air violates the Copyright Act of 1976.

Background
Aereo provides subscribers broadcast television programming over the Internet in essentially real time for a monthly fee. The broadcast process begins when a viewer chooses online which show to watch. Aereo’s servers then select one of thousands of mini antenna to be dedicated to the subscriber for that show. The antenna receives the broadcast, which Aereo saves in a subscriber-specific folder on its hard drive. Then, Aereo streams the personal copy to the subscriber over the Internet only a few seconds behind the over-the-air broadcast. Aereo does not own the copyright in these works or a license from the copyright owners to perform those works publicly.

The Suit
Television networks brought suit against Aereo for copyright infringement in Federal District Court. The Networks sought a preliminary injunction, arguing that Aereo was infringing their right to “perform” their works “publicly.” The District Court denied the preliminary injunction, and the Second Circuit affirmed. The Supreme Court granted certiorari.

The Copyright Act of 1976 gives a copyright owner the “exclusive righ[t]” to “perform the copyrighted work publicly.” 17 U.S.C. § 106(4). The Court identified two questions necessary to deciding this case: (1) Does Aereo “perform” at all? (2) If so, does Aereo do so “publicly”?

Aereo argued that it does not perform, rather it merely supplies equipment that emulates the operation of a home antenna, and it is only the subscribers who perform. In response, the Court began by reviewing the Copyright Act. The Court explained that one of Congress’ primary purposes in amending the Copyright Act in 1976 was to reject the Court’s holdings in two prior cases that community antenna television (“CATV”) systems fell outside of the Act’s scope. CATV systems involve a provider that places antennas that allow subscribers to choose programs they wish to view. The Court noted three changes resulting from the Act’s amendment: (1) Congress changed the language so that both the broadcaster and the viewer of a television program could be considered to “perform” because they both show the program’s images and make audible the program’s sounds, (2) Congress enacted the Transmit Clause which states that an entity performs publicly when it “transmits a performance to the public” 17 U.S.C. § 101, and (3) Congress created a new section of the Act to regulate cable companies’ public performances of copyrighted works. The Court concluded, “Aereo’s activities are substantially similar to those of the CATV companies that Congress amended the Act to reach.”

Aereo claimed that it is different than CATV systems because Aereo’s system remains inert until subscribers indicate that they want to watch a program, whereas a CATV system transmits constantly. The Court rejected this argument, deemed Aereo was “for all practical purposes a traditional cable system,” and explained that “this sole technological difference between Aereo and traditional cable companies does not make a critical difference here.” The Court concluded that an entity that engages in activities like Aereo’s performs.

Aereo denied that it performed the Networks’ work “publicly,” reasoning that the performance it transmits is the performance created by its act of transmitting, and because each of these performances is capable of being received by only one subscriber, Aereo transmits privately, not publicly. The Court assumed that Aereo’s first argument was correct and focused only on Aereo’s contention that it does not transmit a performance “to the public.” The Court noted that in terms of the Act’s purpose, the fact that each subscriber receives data streamed from his own personal copy does not distinguish Aereo’s system from cable systems, which do perform “publicly.” The Court concluded that “when an entity communicates the same contemporaneously perceptible images and sounds to multiple people, it transmits a performance to them regardless of the number of discrete communications it makes.” Moreover, Aereo, through such communication to a large number of people who are unrelated and unknown to each other, transmits to the public, which does not need to be situated together spatially or temporally.

Aereo and its supporting amici argued that if the Court applied the Transmit Clause to Aereo’s conduct, it will impose copyright liability on other new technologies such as cloud computing and DVRs. The Court then readdressed Congress’ intent, elaborating that Congress meant for the Transmit Clause to apply broadly to cable companies but did not intend for it to discourage or control the emergence of different kinds of technologies.

This case reinforces that the Copyright Act of 1976 was specifically created to stop cable systems and cable system lookalikes from rebroadcasting over-the-air content without authorization, yet specifically states that its holding is limited in that it does not address how the Act applies to new technologies.

Justice Scalia, joined by Justices Thomas and Alito, dissented. The dissent concluded that Aereo does not violate the Networks’ “exclusive righ[t]” to “perform” their programs “publicly” because Aereo does not “perform” at all. The dissent claimed that when Aereo subscribers log in, select a channel, and push the “watch” button, the subscribers are the performers, not Aereo. The dissent reasoned that because Aereo does not make the choice of content, it does not engage in volitional conduct that violates the Act, and therefore cannot be held directly liable for infringing the Networks’ public-performance right.

The dissent also criticized the Court’s reasoning, and blamed the Court for gleaning congressional intent from a few snippets of legislative history. The dissent also believed the fact that Aereo transmits only specific programs whereas CATV systems transmits the full range of broadcast signals to all subscribers at all times is a material difference.

Technology changes constantly; whether this decision will provide guidance to lower courts or will sow confusion as stated in the dissent remains to be seen. For now, if a technology is a “cable lookalike” it cannot broadcast without authorization.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© LeClairRyan | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

LeClairRyan
Contact
more
less

LeClairRyan on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):
hide

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.

Security

JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at info@jdsupra.com. In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at: info@jdsupra.com.

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.
Feedback? Tell us what you think of the new jdsupra.com!