Unusual Immigration-Related Cases at the US Supreme Court

Two unusual immigration-related cases currently before the United States Supreme Court involve how non-citizens participate in American political processes. This year’s Presidential election makes these cases particularly noteworthy.

In Bluman v. Federal Election Commission, the plaintiffs argue that non-citizens living legally in the United States but who don’t yet have Lawful Permanent Resident (LPR) status (“green cards”) should have a First Amendment right to contribute to political candidates.

The plaintiffs, Benjamin Bluman and Asenath Steiman, are both foreign nationals who lawfully live and work in America but don’t yet have green cards. Current federal law prohibits foreign nationals (other than green card holders) from making political contributions in connection with any federal, state or local election in the United States. Violating the law is a crime and can result in jail time and substantial fines. The plaintiffs claim that the foreign national ban violates the First Amendment and want the U.S. Supreme Court to declare the law unconstitutional.

Please see full article below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Published In: Constitutional Law Updates, Elections & Politics Updates, Immigration Updates

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Lane Powell PC - Immigration Law Blog | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »