UPDATE: Money, Money, Money: Top 10 Trade Secret Verdicts (With Our Runner-Up Overturned)

more+
less-

http://blogs.orrick.com/trade-secrets-watch/files/2013/07/shutterstock_126039806-200x150.jpgBig IP verdicts aren’t limited to patent cases. Trade secrets can mean big money, too. Really big. As in multi-, multi-million dollar verdicts. And the trend is up with more than half of the top ten verdicts coming out in just the past two years.
shutterstock_122151922
Trials are expensive. They’re also unpredictable. So when a plaintiff seeking damages in a trade secret case decides to take the case all the way through trial, it’s hoping for a jackpot. Otherwise the costs and risks of trial likely wouldn’t make it worth gambling the result on a jury.

For the parties below, the gamble paid off.

Trade Secrets Watch reviewed trade secret misappropriation cases over the past decade and dug up the largest verdicts on record. We also noted any post-verdict information to the extent it was available.

(Editor’s note: The Fourth Circuit has thrown out our second-biggest all-time verdict—a $920 million award to Du Pont for Kolon Industries, Inc.’s alleged theft of trade secrets relating to Kevlar body armor.  It’s the latest in a string of large awards that were subsequently reduced or vacated by courts (see the right-hand column, below).  Also, a Minnesota state appeals court affirmed a $630 million arbitration award against Western Digital Corp. over allegations of trade secret misappropriation. See Seagate Tech. LLC v. Western Digital Corp., No. A12-1944, Minn. Ct. App. (St. Paul) (July 22, 2013). This would have ranked at No. 3 on our list, had a jury made the award. Regardless, this case confirms that the era of massive trade secret awards has arrived.)

Rank

Award

Prevailing Party

Case Name

Post-Verdict Result

#1

$2.3 billion

St. Jude Medical

Pacesetter Inc. v. Nervicon Co., BC424443, California Superior Court, Los Angeles County (April 2011)

Reduced to $947 million

#2

$919.9 million

E.I. du Pont de Nemours

E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co. v. Kolon Industries, Inc., 3:09-cv-00058, U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Virginia (Sept. 2011)

Fourth Circuit vacated the award and remanded for new trial

#3

$465.4 million

Lexar Media

Lexar Media, Inc. v. Toshiba Corp., CV-812458, California Superior Court, Santa Clara County (March 2005)

Trial court ordered new trial on damages; parties later settled for $288 million

#4

$310 million($88.4 million trade secret award, plus attorneys’ fees and punitive damages)

MGA Entertainment

Bryant v. Mattel, 2:04-cv-09049, U.S. District Court, Central District of California (April 2011)

On re-trial of Bryant v. Mattel (see below); trial judge reduced trade secret award to $85 million but awarded $85 million in punitive damages and $139 million in legal fees; Ninth Circuit vacated $172 million judgment but upheld $137 million in legal fees

#5

$192 million

Sven Peter Mannsfeld

Sven Peter Mannsfeld v. Phenolchemie Inc. et al., CV-2006-001956.00, Alabama Circuit Court, Mobile County (Oct. 2008)

Settled for $40 million

#6

$134 million

USA Power

USA Power LLC v. PacifiCorp, 050903412, Utah Third District Court, Salt Lake County (May 2012)

 

#7

$118 million

Bancorp Services

Bancorp Services LLC v. Hartford Life Insurance, 4:00-CV-70, U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Missouri (March 2002)

 

#8

$112 million

Brocade Communications Systems

Brocade Communications Systems Inc. v. A10 Networks Inc., 5:10-cv-03428, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California (Aug. 2012)

Trial judge reduced to approximately $62 million and granted A10's motion for a new damages trial; parties later settled for $75 million

#9

$100 million

Mattel

Bryant v. Mattel, 2:04-cv-09049, U.S. District Court, Central District of California (Aug. 2008)

Ninth Circuit vacated the award and judgment; case re-tried (see above)

#10

$94 million

Wellogix

Wellogix Inc. v. BP America Inc. et al., 3:08-cv-00119, U.S. District Court, Southern District of Texas (May 2011)

Trial judge reduced to $44.4 million; Fifth Circuit affirmed

 

Topics:  BP, DuPont, Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company, Intellectual Property Litigation, Jury Verdicts, Litigation Strategies, Mattel, Toshiba, Trade Secrets, U.S. Bancorp

Published In: Civil Remedies Updates, Intellectual Property Updates

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Orrick - Trade Secrets Group | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »