UPDATE: U.S. Supreme Court Will Decide What Preclusive Effect, If Any, Should Be Given to Likelihood of Confusion Findings by the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board

As we reported in our May 29 client alert, the Solicitor General submitted an amicus brief recommending that the Supreme Court grant a petition for certiorari seeking a determination of whether likelihood of confusion findings by the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board are entitled to preclusive effect in federal court and, if not, what level of deference, if any, such determinations should be accorded. Because available data shows that the Supreme Court’s decision to grant or deny a petition often follows the Solicitor General’s recommendation, we suggested that the petition was likely to be granted. On July 1, 2014, the Supreme Court granted the petition. The parties will now file merits briefs, with Petitioner’s brief due August 15, 2014.

Proskauer’s False Advertising & Trademark lawyers will continue to monitor this case and update our clients. The case is B&B Hardware, Inc. v. Hargis Industries, Inc., No. 13-352.


Topics:  Certiorari, Claim Preclusion, Likelihood of Confusion, SCOTUS, Trademark Litigation, Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, Trademarks

Published In: Civil Procedure Updates, Intellectual Property Updates

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Proskauer Rose LLP | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »