U.S. Bank, N.A. v. Ibanez

US Bank, N.A. v. Ibanez, Slip Opinion, SJC-10694

more+
less-

Posted by George E. Bourguignon, Jr., Foreclosure defense attorney.

The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court has issued its long awaited decision related to foreclosure defense: US Bank, N.A. v. Ibanez. This decision was decided in the consumer's favor and ruled that the prior foreclosures that occurred in Springfield, Massachusetts were not proper. The court affirmed that the banks did not have title to the mortgage when they published the required notices of the expected foreclosure sale or actually conducted the foreclosure sale. It is reported that this case will establish that many prior foreclosures were conducted improperly.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Published In: Civil Remedies Updates, Consumer Protection Updates, Finance & Banking Updates, Commercial Real Estate Updates, Residential Real Estate Updates

Reference Info:Decision | State, 1st Circuit, Massachusetts | United States

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© George Bourguignon, Law Office of George E. Bourguignon, Jr. | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »