US Court of Appeals Revises Opinion: Section 1782’s Use in Arbitration Ambiguous

With the Eleventh Circuit’s revision, using Section 1782 to request the production of evidence in private international commercial arbitrations remains uncertain.

On January 10, the US Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit vacated its 2012 decision allowing an Ecuadorean telecoms operator to use Section 1782 of the Federal Rules of Judicial Procedure to compel discovery against an air freight carrier in support of commercial arbitration proceedings taking place in Ecuador.1 Though the appeals court reaffirmed the district court’s order to compel the production of documents and deposing of witnesses, it did so under alternative grounds, leading to increased uncertainty regarding Section 1782’s application to private international commercial arbitration.

Please see full Commentary below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Topics:  Ambiguous, Arbitration, Commercial Arbitration, International Arbitration, Telecommunications

Published In: Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) Updates, Civil Procedure Updates, General Business Updates, International Trade Updates

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Latham & Watkins LLP | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »