U.S. District Court Issues False Claims Act Judgment for Defendants in Case Challenging Competitive Bidding for DME Contract


After a fourteen-day bench trial, a Mississippi federal court in United States ex rel. Jamison v. McKesson Corp., et al., Civ. A. No. 2:08-cv-214-SA-JMV (N.D. Miss. Sept. 28, 2012), rendered a complete verdict for the defense, holding that in this federal False Claims Act case based on the Anti-Kickback Statute (“AKS”) , the United States had failed to carry its burden to prove that illegal remuneration had been offered or accepted, or that any defendant had acted with the scienter required by the AKS. While much of the Court’s verdict in this intervened case turned on facts and circumstances particular to the case, the Court’s assessment of what is required to prove remuneration and scienter has important implications for companies that may face similar allegations.

What is – and what is not – “remuneration” under the AKS?

The focus of the trial was on two DME supply contracts between subsidiaries of McKesson Corporation and entities representing Beverly Enterprises, an operator of skilled nursing facilities. For each contract, the government’s theory was that the prospect of another contract or other business with Beverly was successfully “dangled” in front of the McKesson subsidiaries in order to induce below fair market value, below cost, or discounted bids from the McKesson defendants. While the theory that a business opportunity can constitute “remuneration” under the AKS is not new, see, e.g., United States v. Bay State Ambulance and Hosp. Rental Serv., 874 F.2d 20, 29 (1st Cir. 1989), pursuing the theory in this case was aggressive, and the Court rejected it for good reason.

Please see full alert below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Ropes & Gray LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:


Ropes & Gray LLP on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:

Sign up to create your digest using LinkedIn*

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.

Already signed up? Log in here

*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.