US High Court Takes on State Antitrust Action Removability Case


Companies accused of antitrust wrongdoing must prepare for a multi-front battle in different courts in different places on different timelines. To survive, they must hire defense counsel with sufficient scale and agility to manage multiple cases, in which each action in one case can reverberate to the others. It isn’t easy to do it right, particularly today where many battles happen in foreign jurisdictions.

The U.S. Supreme Court recently agreed to weigh in on whether defendants can employ the Class Action Fairness Act (CAFA) to, in at least one circumstance, limit the jurisdictional-bounds of a complex action. The court granted certiorari in Mississippi ex rel. Hood v. AU Optronics Corporation, et al., on the issue of whether and under what circumstances a parens patriae action by the state itself in state court against a defendant is removable as a “mass action” under CAFA.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Published In: Antitrust & Trade Regulation Updates, Civil Procedure Updates, Civil Remedies Updates, Constitutional Law Updates, Consumer Protection Updates

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Jarod Bona, Bona Law PC | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »