U.S. Office of Financial Research Issues Report on Asset Management and Financial Stability

by Dechert LLP
Contact

The Office of Financial Research (“OFR”), an office of the U.S. Department of the Treasury, recently issued a report that may provide a roadmap for future designations by the Financial Stability Oversight Council (“FSOC”) of asset management companies for supervision as systemically important financial institutions (”SIFIs”).1 The release, “Asset Management and Financial Stability” (“Report”), describes how in the view of the OFR the U.S. asset management industry may be vulnerable to financial shocks and may contribute to the amplification or transmission of such shocks, which, in turn, may pose threats to U.S. financial stability.

FSOC Implications

When the FSOC in April 2012 issued a final rule regarding how it would exercise its authority to designate nonbank financial companies as SIFIs, it indicated that, with the assistance of the OFR, it was in the process of analyzing the extent to which asset management companies presented potential threats to financial stability. The final rule left open significant questions as to how asset managers would be evaluated under the SIFI designation process.2

The Report suggests that various aspects of asset managers operations may present systemic risks to financial stability. The Report, when read together with the FSOC’s first three SIFI designation decisions, could lead to increased scrutiny of asset management firms by the FSOC.

SEC Request for Comments

On the day the Report was issued, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) announced that it would accept comments from the public on the Report. The SEC’s comment period will be open through November 1, 2013. The SEC comment process offers an important opportunity for persons interested in asset management activities to provide their views regarding the analysis and concerns contained in the Report, and to impact what findings are required to be part of the record when the FSOC considers asset managers for possible designation as SIFIs, among other things.

Key Aspects of the Report

Noting that the U.S. asset management industry oversees the allocation of approximately $53 trillion of financial assets, the Report briefly presents certain data regarding the sources of managed funds, the distribution of assets in the asset management industry, and the asset vehicles and asset categories of assets in which customer funds are invested. However, the more significant part of the Report is the OFR’s discussion of what it describes as the “vulnerabilities” of the asset management industry to financial shocks and how the industry may affect U.S. financial stability.

According to the Report, there are four categories of industry vulnerability:

    • Reaching for Yield and Herding Behavior. Portfolio managers may in certain situations “reach for yield" by seeking higher returns in riskier assets than they otherwise would select for a particular investment strategy. Competitive pressures may also cause asset managers to take on extra risks, and some risks (such as the difficulty of disposing of assets in less liquid markets) may be aggravated by numerous managers crowding into the same asset class. If investors do not understand or appreciate the risks, particularly in newer investment products that expose investors to alternative investment strategies, they may seek to disinvest, further worsening any financial shock.
    • Redemption Risk and Liquidity Management. Collective investment vehicles offering unrestricted redemption rights could face large redemption requests in a stressed market if investors believe that they will gain an economic advantage by being the first to redeem. Asset sales in response to redemption requests could spread the stress from one asset type to another type within the same portfolio and to additional market segments. Increased redemptions may also create a perception that the asset manager is itself at risk of failure.
    • Use of Leverage. Leverage through derivatives contracts, securities lending and repurchase agreements may magnify both gains and losses compared to an investment in the underlying asset or index alone.
    • Asset Managers as a Source of Risk. A large asset manager or an asset manager that is part of a large complex organization may expose its investors to liquidity risk or operational risk. For example, an asset manager of a number of funds could employ strategies that turn out to be correlated in unanticipated ways, or an asset manager could be linked to other companies that provide an array of services to the asset management industry, creating interconnections and dependencies that increase the asset manager’s importance in financial markets. These vulnerabilities and other risks inherent in asset management may be transmitted across the financial system through two primary channels: (i) direct exposure of creditors, counterparties, investors and other market participants to an asset manager or its affiliates; and (ii) disruptions caused by asset “fire sales.” The Report suggests, without providing any examples or explanation, that a concentration of service providers and interconnections between asset managers and other financial services firms increases the potential that risks originating among asset managers could be transmitted to or amplified through other market sectors, and vice versa.
       
Data Gaps

The Report notes that there are significant gaps in available data for several areas of the asset management industry, particularly with regard to the administration of separately managed accounts and practices followed in securities lending. This conclusion may suggest that the OFR will embark upon a process of gathering relevant data from the industry.

Concluding Observations

Interestingly, while the Report describes itself as providing only “a brief overview” of the asset management industry, it does not expressly caution the reader regarding the conclusions that may be drawn based on this limited review. From an administrative law perspective, the admittedly summary nature of the Report, among other matters, contributes to undermining the potential reliance that the FSOC could fairly place on the Report.

It should be a particular concern that the “findings” of the Report — consisting of a general taxonomy of risks from which numerous hypothetical cause-and-effect relationships are drawn, with little discussion of their likelihood, severity or amenability to preventive or corrective measures — so closely resemble the methodology that the FSOC has used in its three SIFI designation orders to date. This similarity suggests that the Report may provide the analytical foundation for the FSOC's future review and possible designation of asset managers as SIFIs, notwithstanding the many issues related to the Report. This emphasizes the importance of public comments to the SEC that provide other perspectives on the operations of asset managers and the risks to financial stability that asset managers may or may not pose.

Footnotes

1. The OFR was established by the Dodd-Frank Act to support the work of the FSOC.

2. See DechertOnPoint, Final U.S. Rule on Designation of SIFIs Emphasizes the Importance of Full Engagement in the Designation Process, April 18, 2012.

 

Written by:

Dechert LLP
Contact
more
less

Dechert LLP on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):
hide

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.

Security

JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at info@jdsupra.com. In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at: info@jdsupra.com.

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.